Legal protection for animals is in our interests – Kimberly Moore

22 March 2024 by

Science tells us that animals are social and sentient creatures, that they experience the world much like we do. But the law treats them very differently. Despite some progress, animals remain inadequately protected, and they can suffer in entertainment, research, farming, and conflicts.

The interconnectedness of humans, animals and the environment is recognised by the World Health Organisation, and the body of scientific work into intelligence in the animal kingdom continues to grow: the songs of Humpback whales are passed down through generations; crows and ravens are renowned for their exceptional problem-solving skills; elephants display empathy and emotional sensitivity; chimpanzees and orangutans exhibit complex tool use; dolphins engage in sophisticated vocalisations and coordinated behaviours. 

A better-informed public is demanding greater legal protection for animals, and it turns out that what is good for animals is also good for us. In 2022, the United Nations adopted a Resolution affirming that the health and welfare of animals is connected to the health and well-being of humans.

We must do better

Human activities drive crises like deforestation, pollution, and climate change. Rooted in exploiting animals and the environment, these actions harm ecosystems and lead to resource scarcity. Marine plastic pollution and oil spills threaten all ocean life. Military exercises kill billions of sea animals; industrial fishing longlines have killed billions more (including many non-target species such as dolphins, whales, and sea turtles). Animal-based food systems contribute to global hunger and water scarcity by depleting vital resources that could otherwise be used to address food insecurity. Animal farming fuels deforestation in order to make way for grazing land and feed crops for farmed animals, which increases the frequency of destructive weather events, exacerbates food and water shortages, and results in species extinction. Our destruction of the natural world also has profound implications for national security; scarce resources, including food and water, are expected to lead to a growing number of wars and conflicts.

These global crises have cascading, detrimental effects on ecosystems and on human societies but for the most part they are unchallenged by legal restraint and, as a result, are accelerating.  Outdated laws that fail to protect the planet’s rich biodiversity and natural spaces are having catastrophic consequences for humanity, but it doesn’t have to be this way. To protect our shared destinies, we must accept that the rights of humans are inextricably linked to how we treat the natural world.  Protecting animals with meaningful and substantive laws, and ensuring that such laws are enforced, is critically important to both people and animals.  

Animal law

In response to growing concerns about the treatment and protection of animals, a new field of law has emerged, known as animal law. This specialised area of legal practice focuses on advocating for the rights and welfare of animals, addressing issues ranging from cruelty and exploitation to conservation and habitat preservation. As the field continues to evolve, it plays a crucial role in shaping legislation, influencing public policy, and fostering a more compassionate and ethical relationship between humans and animals.

Many jurisdictions have enacted laws prohibiting acts of animal cruelty, neglect, and abuse, with penalties ranging from fines to imprisonment. Legislation sets minimum standards for the care and treatment of animals in various contexts, including farming, research, entertainment, and transportation. And legal measures aim to conserve and protect wildlife habitats, regulate hunting and trapping activities, and combat illegal wildlife trafficking. This means there is a widely held view that animals are adequately protected under existing laws. This is not the case. 

Key principles guiding animal law should include recognising animals as sentient beings with inherent value and rights, promoting humane treatment and welfare standards, and holding individuals and entities accountable for acts of cruelty and exploitation.

Developing robust legal frameworks for the protection of animals will require that we recognise an animal’s right to live free from exploitation and harm. It will also require sober reflection on our own actions that contribute to animal suffering and how our mistreatment of animals jeopardises our shared destinies.  Implementing stronger and more coordinated legal measures to protect the natural world will help to safeguard vital ecosystems for both human communities and for animal life. When viewed through the prism of an interconnected world, fundamental human rights are inextricably linked to the rights of animals.  

Despite the compelling grounds for legal reform, there are formidable challenges to change.  The convergence of cultural norms and traditions, influential industries and political corruption all pose challenges to enacting laws that adequately protect animals.  Still, there are grounds for optimism. The past two decades have been a watershed moment for the legal status of animals and new laws are starting to take hold in many countries. Because humanity’s destiny is undeniably tied to the destiny of the animal kingdom, the question is not “if” but “when” laws will change.

Related post: Strasbourg Court dismisses challenges to bans on ritual slaughter without stunning for Halal and Kosher meat

Kimberly Moore is a senior attorney and a Fellow at the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics. She is the author of The Case for the Legal Protection of Animals, Humanity’s Shared Destiny with the Animal Kingdom

Leave a Reply

Welcome to the UKHRB


This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editors: Darragh Coffey
Jasper Gold
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough KC
David Hart KC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy
Jonathan Metzer

Free email updates


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe

Categories


Disclaimer


This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.

Tags


Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice administrative court adoption ALBA Allison Bailey Al Qaeda animal rights anonymity Appeals Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 Artificial Intelligence Asbestos assisted suicide asylum Australia autism benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery Catholicism Chagos Islanders charities Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners climate change clinical negligence Coercion common law confidentiality consent conservation constitution contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus Coroners costs court of appeal Court of Protection covid crime Criminal Law Cybersecurity Damages Dartmoor data protection death penalty defamation deportation deprivation of liberty Detention diplomatic immunity disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of candour duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Employment Law Employment Tribunal enforcement Environment Equality Act Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Fair Trials Family Fertility FGM Finance football foreign criminals foreign office France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Free Speech Gay marriage Gaza gender Gender Recognition Act genetics Germany gmc Google government Grenfell Health healthcare high court HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction injunctions Inquests international law internet Inuit Iran Iraq Ireland Islam Israel Italy IVF Jalla v Shell Japan Japanese Knotweed Journalism Judaism judicial review jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Land Reform Law Pod UK legal aid legal ethics legality Leveson Inquiry LGBTQ Rights liability Libel Liberty Libya Lithuania local authorities marriage Maya Forstater mental capacity Mental Health military Ministry of Justice Mirror Principle modern slavery monitoring murder music Muslim nationality national security NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges nuisance Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal Parole patents Pensions Personal Injury Piracy Plagiarism planning Poland Police Politics pollution press Prisoners Prisons privacy Private Property Procedural Fairness Professional Discipline Property proportionality Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries public law Regulatory Proceedings rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo Right to assembly right to die right to family life Right to Privacy Right to Roam right to swim riots Roma Romania Round Up Royals Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice Sex sexual offence sexual orientation Sikhism Smoking social media Social Work South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing statelessness Statutory Interpretation stop and search Strasbourg Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture Transgender travel travellers treaty TTIP Turkey UK Ukraine UK Supreme Court unduly harsh united nations unlawful detention USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks Wild Camping wind farms WomenInLaw YearInReview Zimbabwe

Tags


Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice administrative court adoption ALBA Allison Bailey Al Qaeda animal rights anonymity Appeals Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 Artificial Intelligence Asbestos assisted suicide asylum Australia autism benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery Catholicism Chagos Islanders charities Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners climate change clinical negligence Coercion common law confidentiality consent conservation constitution contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus Coroners costs court of appeal Court of Protection covid crime Criminal Law Cybersecurity Damages Dartmoor data protection death penalty defamation deportation deprivation of liberty Detention diplomatic immunity disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of candour duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Employment Law Employment Tribunal enforcement Environment Equality Act Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Fair Trials Family Fertility FGM Finance football foreign criminals foreign office France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Free Speech Gay marriage Gaza gender Gender Recognition Act genetics Germany gmc Google government Grenfell Health healthcare high court HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction injunctions Inquests international law internet Inuit Iran Iraq Ireland Islam Israel Italy IVF Jalla v Shell Japan Japanese Knotweed Journalism Judaism judicial review jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Land Reform Law Pod UK legal aid legal ethics legality Leveson Inquiry LGBTQ Rights liability Libel Liberty Libya Lithuania local authorities marriage Maya Forstater mental capacity Mental Health military Ministry of Justice Mirror Principle modern slavery monitoring murder music Muslim nationality national security NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges nuisance Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal Parole patents Pensions Personal Injury Piracy Plagiarism planning Poland Police Politics pollution press Prisoners Prisons privacy Private Property Procedural Fairness Professional Discipline Property proportionality Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries public law Regulatory Proceedings rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo Right to assembly right to die right to family life Right to Privacy Right to Roam right to swim riots Roma Romania Round Up Royals Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice Sex sexual offence sexual orientation Sikhism Smoking social media Social Work South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing statelessness Statutory Interpretation stop and search Strasbourg Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture Transgender travel travellers treaty TTIP Turkey UK Ukraine UK Supreme Court unduly harsh united nations unlawful detention USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks Wild Camping wind farms WomenInLaw YearInReview Zimbabwe

Discover more from UK Human Rights Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading