Public Law Podcast Seminar on Radicalisation Part 3: Detention

27 October 2017 by

Detention and the common European Asylum System  –  Alasdair Henderson and Suzanne Lambert

The highlights of the Public Law Seminar given by members of 1 Crown Office Row are now available for podcast download here or from iTunes under Law Pod UK, Episodes 13, 14 and 15. For ease of reference the following three posts set out the introductions to each of the presentations and the case citations.

For non-Apple devices the podcasts are available via the Audioboom app.

Click on the heading for PDF copies of each of the presentations.


  • Detention in UK pending transfer to another Member State;
  • Detention in another Member State pending transfer to the UK;
  • Risk of detention in another state as grounds for resisting transfer.

Common European Asylum System

  •  the Dublin III Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 604/2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national).
  • the Reception Directives (Council Directive 2013/33/EU laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers (“the recast Reception Directive”). The UK has opted out of the recast version, and remains governed by the previous version: Council Directive 2003/9/EC laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers)
  • the Qualification Directives (Council Directive 2011/95). Again, this the recast Qualification Directive does not apply to the UK. The UK remains governed by Qualification Directive 2004/83/EC).
  • the Procedures Directives (Council Directive 2013/32/EU on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (“the recast Procedures Directive”). Again, this does not apply to the UK. The UK remains governed by Council Directive 2005/85/EC.
  • the Eurodac Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 603/2013


Cases referred to the in podcast and PDF:

Case C-4/11 Puid v Bundesrepulik Deutschland [2014] Q.B. 346

Case C-528/15 Policie CR and others v Al Chodor and others

Pour v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWHC 401 (Admin); [2016] 2 C.M.L.R. 47

NS [2012] 2 C.M.L.R. 9

Abdullahi [2014] 1 W.L.R. 1895

EM (Eritrea) [2014] UKSC 12 .

SMM v UK [2017] ECHR 582 (22 June 2017)

YA [2017] EWHC 2135 (Admin)

OM (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 909

Muasa v SSHD (QBD (Admin Court), 27 July 2017, (unreported)

Wamala v Tascor Services [2017] EWHC 1461 (QB)

S v SSHD (QBD (Admin Court), 1 September 2017, unreported)

Miyanji v SSHD [2017] EWHC 1939 (QB)

1 comment;

  1. As always, the devil is in the detail.

Welcome to the UKHRB

This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.




This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.


Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption ALBA Al Qaeda animal rights anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 Artificial Intelligence Asbestos assisted suicide asylum Australia autism benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery Catholicism Chagos Islanders Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners climate change clinical negligence Coercion common law confidentiality consent conservation constitution contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus costs Court of Protection crime Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation deportation deprivation of liberty Detention disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Family Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage Gaza genetics Germany Google Grenfell Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests international law internet Inuit Iran Iraq Ireland Islam Israel Italy IVF Japan Judaism judicial review jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid Leveson Inquiry LGBTQ Rights liability Libel Liberty Libya Lithuania local authorities marriage mental capacity Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery music Muslim nationality national security NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury Piracy Plagiarism planning Poland Police Politics pollution press Prisoners Prisons privacy Professional Discipline Property proportionality Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania Round Up Royals Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice sexual offence Sikhism Smoking social media South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing statelessness stop and search Strasbourg Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture travel treaty TTIP Turkey UK Ukraine USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wind farms WomenInLaw YearInReview Zimbabwe
%d bloggers like this: