Human rights roundup: Sovereignty clause, forced marriage, more Stig

8 October 2010 by



Ain't no sovereignty clause


Some of this week’s human rights news, in bite-size form. The full list of our external links can be found on the right sidebar or here.

Speeches: “The English Law of Privacy: An Evolving Human Right” – Lord Walker – UKSC blog: Supreme Court Justice Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe gave a speech to Anglo-Australasian Lawyers Society on the subject of privacy.  The lecture contains an interesting overview of the current law of privacy, particularly in relation to the media.

Kenneth Clarke reveals what cuts will mean for the courts – Joshua Rozenberg: The Ministry of Justice has to make £2bn cuts from its £9bn budget (see our post on where the cuts are likely to come from). According the justice ministers’ Tory conference speech, legal aid is in line for a “total review” – no surprises there – and that popular panacea, alternative dispute resolution, will be encouraged and court discouraged. Rozenberg concludes: “Things are not going to get better and nobody should pretend otherwise. All we can hope for is the best publicly funded legal system that we can afford.” Difficult times ahead for access to justice.

Equalities watchdog publishes guide to complying with duties when making cuts – Local Government Lawyer: The guidance is here. According to LGL, ” It warned that the duties “should remain a top priority, even in times of economic difficulty”, adding that failure to meet the relevant duties may result in authorities being exposed to costly, time-consuming and reputation-damaging legal challenges”. The Fawcett Society is currently seeking to judicially review the government’s emergency budget as it believes the government failed to assess, as it is obligated under equalities law, whether the budget would increase or reduce inequality between men and women. I discussed the issues surrounding human rights in the age of austerity yesterday in this post.

Special advocates should not be used in international forced marriage cases – New High Court judgment: In Chief Constable & Anor v YK & Ors, the High Court has ruled that special advocates (lawyers instructed to handle security-sensitive evidence in special private hearings) should almost never be used in proceedings to protect a person from a forced marriage (see Paras 88 to 93). This reinforces the general rule – as set out by the Court of Appeal recently (see our post) – that evidence should not be kept secret in civil proceedings. Update: Isabel McArdle’s case summary is here.

William Hague promises UK sovereignty law – BBC News: The Foreign Secretary has pledged to make good a pre-election promise: “A sovereignty clause on EU law will place on the statute book this eternal truth: what a sovereign parliament can do, a sovereign parliament can also undo.” The speech can be read here. Carl Gardner wrote yesterday on that “This legislation would be a pointless exercise at best, monkeying around with the essentials of the constitution for no better reason than political symbolism, yet also involving subtle legal perils.” We will be posting on this shortly. In the meantime, what better reason to recall Groucho and Chico Marx’s “the ain’t no sanity clause”  scene from A Night at the Opera (hat tip commenter Ivanpope) …

Opinion: “The emerging media Article 10 right to receive information from public authorities” – Antony White QC : An interesting discussion from Inforrm’s blog on whether a right to receive information, which is expressly provided for in Article 10 ECHR but has generally been ignored by the courts, is emerging. I have posted on this previously – see here, or here for all of our posts on freedom of information.

Case Law: BBC v HarperCollins and others – The Stig case – Inforrm’s Blog: This case has been widely commented on due to its subject matter, but has at its heart some interesting legal questions regarding freedom of speech and contractual rights. See Matt Hill’s post, and the comment section.

And don’t forget our posts, including two from new authors…

Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS

Welcome to the UKHRB

This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.




This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.


Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption ALBA Al Qaeda animal rights anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 Artificial Intelligence Asbestos assisted suicide asylum Australia autism benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery Catholicism Chagos Islanders Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners climate change clinical negligence Coercion common law confidentiality consent conservation constitution contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus costs Court of Protection crime Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation deportation deprivation of liberty Detention disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Family Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage Gaza genetics Germany Google Grenfell Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests international law internet Inuit Iran Iraq Ireland Islam Israel Italy IVF Japan Judaism judicial review jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid Leveson Inquiry LGBTQ Rights liability Libel Liberty Libya Lithuania local authorities marriage mental capacity Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery music Muslim nationality national security NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury Piracy Plagiarism planning Poland Police Politics pollution press Prisoners Prisons privacy Professional Discipline Property proportionality Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania Round Up Royals Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice sexual offence Sikhism Smoking social media South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing statelessness stop and search Strasbourg Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture travel treaty TTIP Turkey UK Ukraine USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wind farms WomenInLaw YearInReview Zimbabwe
%d bloggers like this: