A Local Authority v H [2012] EWHC 49 (COP) – Read judgment The Court of Protection has ruled that an autistic woman with an IQ of 64 does not have the mental capacity to engage in sexual relations, on the basis that she does not understand the implications and cannot effectively deploy the information she has [...]
Archive for the ‘Medical’ Category
Are lawyers in right-to-die cases breaking the law?
Posted in Art. 2 | Right to life, Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion, Case summaries, Criminal, Disciplinary Proceedings, Medical, tagged assisting suicide, suicide act 1961 on January 31, 2012 | Comments Off
Philip Havers QC of 1 Crown Office Row is representing Martin in the judicial review proceedings. He is not the author of this post. Albert Camus famously wrote: ‘there is but one truly serious philosophical problem and that is suicide.’ However profound a philosophical problem, the question of suicide or, more precisely, assisted suicide is proving quite [...]
A step closer to the legalisation of assisted suicide?
Posted in Art. 2 | Right to life, Art. 8 | Right to Privacy/Family, Family, In the news, Medical, Mental Health, tagged assisted suicide, non voluntary euthanasia, terry pratchett on January 5, 2012 | 1 Comment »
The Commission on Assisted Dying, set up in September 2010 and chaired by former Lord Chancellor Charles Falconer, has issued its monumental report on assisted dying in England and Wales. The Commission was funded by two supporters of assisted suicide, author Terry Pratchett and businessman Bernard Lewis, and despite reassurances that the running and outcome [...]
How private are patients’ dental records?
Posted in Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, Art. 8 | Right to Privacy/Family, Case summaries, Disciplinary Proceedings, Medical, tagged human rights on November 21, 2011 | 1 Comment »
This is a case in which Philip Havers QC of 1 Crown Office Row appeared for the General Dental Council; he is not the author of this post. The General Dental Council v Savery and others [2011] EWHC 3011 (Admin) – Read judgment Mr Justice Sales in the High Court has ruled that the General [...]
Insurers’ human right not to pay for putting asbestos in employees’ lungs?
Posted in Damages, Environment, In the news, Medical, Personal Injury, Protocol 1 Art. 1 | Peaceful enjoyment of property on October 13, 2011 | 1 Comment »
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011 When you breathed in asbestos fibres from your dusty shipbuilding job on the River Clyde in the 1950s and 1960s, some of those fibres stuck around in the lungs. Some may cause the pleural plaques seen on [...]
Lord Justice Jackson: legal aid should remain for clinical negligence
Posted in Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, Costs and Procedure, Damages, In the news, Medical, Personal Injury, Politics / Public Order, tagged conditional fee agreements, Costs and Procedure, legal aid, legal aid cuts, Lord Justice Jackson on September 13, 2011 | 1 Comment »
Lord Justice Jackson spoke in strong terms last week to the Cambridge Law Faculty on the controversial topic of legal aid and legal costs reforms. The architect of the proposed reforms to legal costs made clear his position on the government’s proposed amendments, set out in the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill, which was [...]
Dismissal of hospital consultant did not breach fair trial rights
Posted in Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, Case comments, Employment, Medical, tagged Mattu v The University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust [2011] EWHC 2068 (QB) on August 3, 2011 | 1 Comment »
Mattu v The University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust [2011] EWHC 2068 (QB)- Read judgment The High Court has dismissed Dr Raj Mattu’s claim that his dismissal by an NHS Trust was in breach of contract and in breach of his Article 6 right to a hearing before an independent and impartial tribunal. [...]
Nuclear test veterans appeal to be heard by Supreme Court
Posted in Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, Case summaries, Damages, Medical, Personal Injury on July 29, 2011 | 1 Comment »
On Thursday 28th July, the Supreme Court heard a “permission to appeal” argument in the British nuclear testing case. The judgment to be appealed is that of the Court of Appeal Civil Division in Ministry of Defence v AB and others[2010] EWCA Civ 1317 – (Smith and Leveson LJJ and Sir Mark Waller). In terse legalese, [...]
Public purse stays closed for morbidly obese man
Posted in Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, Art. 8 | Right to Privacy/Family, Case comments, Margin of Appreciation, Medical on July 28, 2011 | 1 Comment »
Condliff, R (on the application of) v North Staffordshire Primary Care Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 910 – Read judgment A morbidly obese man has lost his appeal against his local Primary Care Trust’s (PCT’s) refusal to fund his anti-obesity surgery. The Court of Appeal ruled that the PCT had no obligation under Article 8 of [...]
Admissibility of hearsay evidence at General Medical Council hearing breached right to fair trial
Posted in Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, Case comments, Case summaries, Disciplinary Proceedings, Medical on June 22, 2011 | Comments Off
R (Bonhoeffer) v General Medical Council [2011] EWHC 1585 (Admin) – read judgment This post was coauthored by Richard Mumford and Joanna Glynn QC. Kieran Coonan QC and Neil Sheldon of 1 Crown Office Row appeared for the claimant in this case. On 21 June 2011 the Divisional Court held to be “irrational and … [...]
Should male circumcision be banned?
Posted in Art. 14 | Anti-Discrimination, Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion, In the news, Medical, Religion on June 15, 2011 | 19 Comments »
Yesterday Neil Howard and Rebecca Steinfeld asked via guardian.co.uk whether it is Time to ban male circumcision? The article was prompted by attempts to ban the practice in San Francisco. Male circumcision is common amongst Muslims and Jews, but judging from the 286 comments (so far!) to the article, there are a lot of people who feel [...]
Panorama at Winterbourne View: the human rights angle – Lucy Series
Posted in Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, Art. 5 | Right to Liberty, Art. 8 | Right to Privacy/Family, Criminal, In the news, Medical, Mental Health on June 3, 2011 | 6 Comments »
I watched Panorama’s exposé of institutional abuse of adults with learning disabilities at Winterbourne View Hospital with mounting horror. What legal mechanisms were available to prevent abuses like this, or bring justice to victims? There can be little doubt that the acts of the carers towards the patients were inhuman and degrading, a violation of [...]





Analysis | Rabone and the rights to life of voluntary mental health patients – Part 2/2
Posted in Art. 2 | Right to life, Case comments, Inquests and Inquiries, Medical, Mental Health, tagged Rabone and another v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust [2012] UKSC 2 on February 14, 2012 | 1 Comment »
This is the second of two blogs on the recent Supreme Court case of Rabone and another v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust [2012] UKSC 2 . Part 1 is here. In my previous blog on the Supreme Court’s judgment in Rabone I discussed the central feature of the case, the extension of the operational [...]
Read Full Post »