The Weekly Round Up: Human trafficking, modern slavery and the Troubles legacy case

10 May 2026 by

In the news

On Tuesday, the Council of Europe’s group of experts on action against trafficking in human beings (GRETA) published an evaluation report, raising concerns about barriers to victims accessing legal assistance and free legal aid in the UK [208-217]. 

The report noted that the Government had failed to provide legal assistance during the identification process and prior to entering the NRM, and to ensure that free legal aid is available for the procedure before the Criminal Injuries Compensation Schemes  — despite the fact that these recommendations had been “made repeatedly” by GRETA in previous reports [287]. 

GRETA also warned that victims of trafficking continue to be prosecuted and convicted for offences that they were compelled to commit as part of their exploitation, despite the revised guidance on the non-prosecution of victims of human trafficking [236-253] — produced in response to the V.C.L. and A.N. v the United Kingdom (App nos 77587/12 and 74603/12) [2021] ECHR. In that case, the European Court of Human Rights held that the UK had breached the rights to freedom from slavery and to a fair trial, as guaranteed by Articles 4 and 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, by prosecuting two potential victims of child trafficking. 

GRETA recommends providing further training and guidance to law enforcement officers and legal professionals on the application of the non-punishment provision in order to “address the subtle ways by which victims can be compelled to commit offences” [253]. 

The publication of the report comes on the same day as the Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner, Eleanor Lyons, warned that the Government’s current response to modern slavery is “no longer sufficient”. 

According to the Commissioner’s report, referrals into the National Referral Mechanism (NRM) reached  23,411 in 2025 — the highest number on record and a 22% increase from 2024. The report also highlights a 54% rise in the sexual exploitation of British girls in the last five years, with children accounting for almost a third of NRM referrals in 2025. 

The report warned that technology — including AI, cryptocurrencies, and online platforms — is accelerating and obscuring exploitation. 

The Anticipating Exploitation: A Futures Analysis report also raised concerns that the conflation of immigration and modern slavery risks a lack of coherence and “oversimplifying the problem”. The report notes that British nationals are now the highest proportion of victims of modern slavery, with one in five individuals referred to the NRM last year being a UK national. 

In other news: 

  • Two Sudanese asylum seekers have launched the first legal challenge against the new Home Office policy of granting only temporary status to refugees, on the basis that it is discriminatory and an ineffective deterrent to asylum seekers, according to a report published this week by The Guardian.
  • The Secretary General of the Council of Europe, Alain Berset, told Politico that a “consequence” of the UK leaving the European Convention on Human Rights would be that it would “create a new group” of countries, with Russia and Belarus.   
  • On Monday, Meta filed a request to overturn a landmark ruling by the California Superior Court, which found Meta and Google liable for the deterioration of a young woman’s mental health by designing addictive products. 

In the courts

Dillon v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2026] UKSC 15

On Thursday, the Supreme Court unanimously allowed the Government’s appeal, holding that the Northern Ireland (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 (“the 2023 Act”) did not result in a diminution of rights contrary to Article 2(1) of the Windsor Framework, which forms part of the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement.

The case stemmed from judicial review proceedings brought by four Troubles victims — Martina Dillon, John McEvoy, Brigid Hughes and Lynda McManus — who challenged the provisions of the 2023 Act relating to the granting of immunity and the termination of police investigations into Troubles-related offences [14]. Around 1,200 cases relating to killings during the Troubles remain unsolved [1]. 

Article 2(1) of the Windsor Framework provides that the United Kingdom “shall ensure that no diminution of rights, safeguards or equality of opportunity, as set out in that part of the [Belfast] Agreement” results from its withdrawal from the EU [69].

The Court held that the 2023 Act did not diminish the rights conferred by the EU Victims Directive, and therefore did not give rise to a diminution of rights results from withdrawal from the EU. The Court emphasised that the Victims Directive is “not the source of a right for all victims of crime to see perpetrators prosecuted” [137]. 

The Court — following the judgments in Case 12/86 Demirel v Stadt Schwabisch Gmund [1987] ECR 3719 and Case C-240/09 Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK v Ministerstvo životného prostredia Slovenskej republiky [2012] — upheld that Article 2(1) is capable of having direct effect if, regard being had to its wording, purpose and nature, it contains a clear and precise obligation that does not depend on further action by the EU or the UK before it can take effect [112]. 

However, in the present case the specific provisions relied upon in the Belfast Agreement cannot have direct effect because they are expressed in too general terms, including “civil rights”, “mutual respect”, “religious liberties”, “acknowledge and address the suffering of the victims of violence” and “a right to remember” [114].  

The judgment follows a House of Commons carry-over motion on the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill, passed the previous week, which seeks to repeal and replace the 2023 Act. 

On the UKHRB

  • Dan Pollen examines freedom of expression in the context of secondary education.

Leave a Reply

Welcome to the UKHRB

This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:

Commissioning Editor:
Jasper Gold

Assistant Editor:
Allyna Ng

Editors:
Rosalind English
Angus McCullough KC
David Hart KC
Martin Downs

Jim Duffy
Jonathan Metzer

Free email updates


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe

Categories


Disclaimer


This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.

Tags


A2P1 Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice administrative court administrative law adoption ALBA Allison Bailey Al Qaeda animal rights anonymity appeal Appeals Arrest Art 2 Article 1 Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 article 3 protocol 1 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 Artificial Intelligence Asbestos Assisted Dying assisted suicide assumption of responsibility asylum Attorney General Australia autism benefits Best Interest Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery Business care orders Caster Semenya Catholicism Chagos Islanders charities Children children's rights children act China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners climate change clinical negligence Closed Material Proceedings Closed proceedings Coercion common law confidentiality consent conservation constitution contempt contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus Coroners costs court of appeal Court of Arbitration for Sport Court of Protection covid crime Criminal Law Cybersecurity Damages Dartmoor data protection death penalty defamation deportation deprivation of liberty Detention diplomatic immunity disability discipline disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence DPA drug policy DSD Regulations duty of candour duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Employment Law Employment Tribunal enforcement Environment environmental rights Equality Act Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Court of Justice euthanasia evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Extraterritoriality Fair Trials Family family law Fertility FGM Finance findings of fact football foreign criminals foreign office Foster France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Free Speech Gambling Gay marriage Gaza gender Gender Recognition Act genetics Germany gmc Google government Grenfell Hate Speech Health healthcare high court HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Huntington's Disease immigration immunity India Indonesia information injunction injunctions inquest Inquests international law internet interview Inuit Iran Iraq Ireland Islam Israel Italy IVF Jalla v Shell Japan Japanese Knotweed Journalism Judaism judicial review jury jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Land Reform Law Pod UK legal aid legal ethics legality Leveson Inquiry LGBTQ Rights liability Libel Liberty Libya Lithuania local authorities marriage Maya Forstater mental capacity Mental Health mental health act military Ministry of Justice Mirror Principle modern slavery monitoring murder music Muslim nationality national security NHS Northern Ireland NRPF nuclear challenges nuisance Obituary open justice Osman v UK ouster clauses PACE parental responsibility parental rights Parliament parliamentary expenses scandal parliamentary privilege Parole patents Pensions Personal Data Personal Injury Piracy Plagiarism planning Poland Police Politics pollution press Prisoners Prisons privacy Private Property Procedural Fairness procedural safeguards Professional Discipline Property proportionality proscription Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Protocols Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries public law reasons regulatory Regulatory Proceedings rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion Religious Freedom RightsInfo Right to assembly right to die Right to Education right to family life Right to life Right to Privacy Right to Roam right to swim riots Roma Romania Round Up Royals Russia S.31(2A) sanctions Saudi Arabia school Schools Scotland secrecy secret justice Section 55 separation of powers Sex sexual offence sexual orientation Sikhism Smoking social media Social Work South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Sports Law Standing statelessness Statutory Interpretation stop and search Strasbourg Strategic litigation suicide Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture Transgender travel travellers treaty tribunals TTIP Turkey UK UK Constitutional Law Blog Ukraine UK Supreme Court Ullah unduly harsh united nations unlawful detention USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability voting Wales war War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks Wild Camping wind farms WINDRUSH WomenInLaw World Athletics YearInReview Zimbabwe

Tags


A2P1 Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice administrative court administrative law adoption ALBA Allison Bailey Al Qaeda animal rights anonymity appeal Appeals Arrest Art 2 Article 1 Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 article 3 protocol 1 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 Artificial Intelligence Asbestos Assisted Dying assisted suicide assumption of responsibility asylum Attorney General Australia autism benefits Best Interest Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery Business care orders Caster Semenya Catholicism Chagos Islanders charities Children children's rights children act China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners climate change clinical negligence Closed Material Proceedings Closed proceedings Coercion common law confidentiality consent conservation constitution contempt contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus Coroners costs court of appeal Court of Arbitration for Sport Court of Protection covid crime Criminal Law Cybersecurity Damages Dartmoor data protection death penalty defamation deportation deprivation of liberty Detention diplomatic immunity disability discipline disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence DPA drug policy DSD Regulations duty of candour duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Employment Law Employment Tribunal enforcement Environment environmental rights Equality Act Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Court of Justice euthanasia evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Extraterritoriality Fair Trials Family family law Fertility FGM Finance findings of fact football foreign criminals foreign office Foster France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Free Speech Gambling Gay marriage Gaza gender Gender Recognition Act genetics Germany gmc Google government Grenfell Hate Speech Health healthcare high court HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Huntington's Disease immigration immunity India Indonesia information injunction injunctions inquest Inquests international law internet interview Inuit Iran Iraq Ireland Islam Israel Italy IVF Jalla v Shell Japan Japanese Knotweed Journalism Judaism judicial review jury jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Land Reform Law Pod UK legal aid legal ethics legality Leveson Inquiry LGBTQ Rights liability Libel Liberty Libya Lithuania local authorities marriage Maya Forstater mental capacity Mental Health mental health act military Ministry of Justice Mirror Principle modern slavery monitoring murder music Muslim nationality national security NHS Northern Ireland NRPF nuclear challenges nuisance Obituary open justice Osman v UK ouster clauses PACE parental responsibility parental rights Parliament parliamentary expenses scandal parliamentary privilege Parole patents Pensions Personal Data Personal Injury Piracy Plagiarism planning Poland Police Politics pollution press Prisoners Prisons privacy Private Property Procedural Fairness procedural safeguards Professional Discipline Property proportionality proscription Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Protocols Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries public law reasons regulatory Regulatory Proceedings rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion Religious Freedom RightsInfo Right to assembly right to die Right to Education right to family life Right to life Right to Privacy Right to Roam right to swim riots Roma Romania Round Up Royals Russia S.31(2A) sanctions Saudi Arabia school Schools Scotland secrecy secret justice Section 55 separation of powers Sex sexual offence sexual orientation Sikhism Smoking social media Social Work South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Sports Law Standing statelessness Statutory Interpretation stop and search Strasbourg Strategic litigation suicide Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture Transgender travel travellers treaty tribunals TTIP Turkey UK UK Constitutional Law Blog Ukraine UK Supreme Court Ullah unduly harsh united nations unlawful detention USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability voting Wales war War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks Wild Camping wind farms WINDRUSH WomenInLaw World Athletics YearInReview Zimbabwe

Discover more from UK Human Rights Blog

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading