Travel between England and Wales

26 June 2020 by

This post is written in response to a comment by a reader, John Burton, of Rosalind English’s post on the latest in the Lockdown challenge launched by Simon Dolan in which Philip Havers QC has been instructed.

We don’t dispense legal advice from the UKHRB, but I thought this was a very interesting question and the editorial board felt it best to try to answer it in a separate post, so here it is, and many thanks to Henry Tufnell, one of our pupil barristers, soon to become one of our new tenants, for taking up the challenge.

First, a reminder of the question, from a reader in Wales, regarding their ability to visit, and be visited by their son across the border. Here is the full comment:

Can I just leave a point relating to ‘cross border’ lockdown that no one seems to have considered. Perhaps someone with a legal mind could comment (I have no legal training or knowledge).

I live in Wales were the ‘lockdown’ regulations have become ever more restrictive. The last update to the regulations limited us to having to remain local (which guidance deems to be 5 miles). My son lives in England and would like to visit me. The Police in Wales have been stopping cars from England and turning them back.

However, the legislation, here, restricting travel etc. is The Health Protection (Coronavirus Restrictions) (Wales) Regulations 2020

Section 1 (2) says “These Regulations apply in relation to Wales”

Section 8 (1) restricts travel ” During the emergency period, no person may leave the place where they are living without reasonable excuse.”

Thus, I would contend, that anyone visiting Wales from England cannot have their travel restricted as they do not live in Wales for this section to apply. i.e. The Act does not restrict travel per se, it just restricts people leaving the ‘place where they are living’. If the do not have a home here in Wales it cannot not therefore apply.

Perhaps someone could have a think about this and cross border enforcement in general? I’d be interested in some views.

The position in relation to cross-border travel between England and Wales has caused confusion in recent weeks. It has been subject to posts from UKHR readers and there have been news articles showing that many people have been entering Wales from England to access beauty spots, unaware that there are different regulations governing the two countries. This post will attempt to clarify the current position. 

The Regulations

The Health Protection (Coronavirus Restrictions) (Wales) Regulations 2020/353 (“the Welsh Regulations”) sets out at Regulation 1(2) that they “apply in relation to Wales.” Similarly, the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020/350 (“the English Regulations”) sets out at Regulation 1(2) that they apply “in relation to England only.” 

The restrictions on movement and being indoors during the “lockdown” period for Wales are set out at Regulation 8(1) of the Welsh Regulations, where it states that:

“(1) During the emergency period, no person may, without reasonable excuse

(a) leave the area local to the place where they are living or remain away from that area;

(b) gather in indoor premises with another person who is not—

(i) a member of their household,

(ii) their carer, or

(iii) a person they are providing care to.”

Regulation 8(1) is subject to a list of “reasonable excuses” which are set out at Regulation 8(2) & (3), although these are not be discussed in detail here. Regulation 8(4) also sets out the position in relation to exercise:

“(4) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply to a person who is exercising, but only where the exercise starts and finishes at the place where the person is living.”

This can be contrasted with the English Regulations which has less stringent restrictions in place on movement. Regulation 6(1) of the English Regulations sets out the following:

“(1) No person may, without reasonable excuse, stay overnight at any place other than the place where they are living [or where their linked household is living].”

Cross-Border Travel

Given the difference between the two sets of Regulations, the issue arises whether someone living in England is able to cross over the border to visit Wales when they do not have a “reasonable excuse”. 

Regulation 8(1) of the Welsh Regulations sets out that no person may leave the area local to where they live or remain from that area without reasonable excuse. The meaning of the term “local” has been addressed in Guidance issued by the Welsh Government. As a general rule it is stated that “local” is anything within about five miles of your home, although in rural areas this distance might be greater to account for the fact that amenities and public services may be spread over a greater geographical area. 

If, therefore, people living in England were to cross over the border into Wales, they would immediately be contravening Regulation 8(1) unless they had a “reasonable excuse” for doing so. This would not apply to people living in England who live close to the Welsh border and have to travel into Wales to access public services and amenities. In addition, an individual living in England would be able to exercise in Wales provided that they were starting and ending their exercise at the place where they live.

Conclusion

The situation is clearly fast-moving and will be subject to further changes in the coming weeks. However, at present it seems that an individual living in England would be acting contrary to the Welsh Regulations by driving a significant distance into Wales in order to visit friends and family or for exercise and other leisure activities.

Henry Tufnell is a pupil barrister at 1 Crown Office Row

1 comment;


  1. mlcleaver says:

    Very succinct explanation.

Comments are closed.

Welcome to the UKHRB


This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe

Categories


Tags


Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption AI air pollution air travel ALBA Allergy Al Qaeda Amnesty International animal rights Animals anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 article 263 TFEU Artificial Intelligence Asbestos Assange assisted suicide asylum asylum seekers Australia autism badgers benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery British Waterways Board Catholic Church Catholicism Chagos Islanders Charter of Fundamental Rights child protection Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners civil partnerships climate change clinical negligence closed material procedure Coercion Commission on a Bill of Rights common law communications competition confidentiality consent conservation constitution contact order contact tracing contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus coronavirus act 2020 costs costs budgets Court of Protection covid crime criminal law Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation DEFRA deportation deprivation of liberty derogations Detention Dignitas diplomacy disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Equality Act 2010 Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Convention on Human Rights European Court of Human Rights European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Facebook Facial Recognition Family Fatal Accidents Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office foreign policy France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage gay rights Gaza Gender genetics Germany Google Grenfell Gun Control Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Human Rights Watch Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests insurance international law internet inuit Iran Iraq Ireland islam Israel Italy IVF ivory ban Japan joint enterprise judaism judicial review Judicial Review reform Julian Assange jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid legal aid cuts Leveson Inquiry lgbtq liability Libel Liberty Libya lisbon treaty Lithuania local authorities marriage Media and Censorship mental capacity Mental Capacity Act Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery morocco murder music Muslim nationality national security naturism neuroscience NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges nuisance Obituary parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury physician assisted death Piracy Plagiarism planning planning system Poland Police Politics Pope press prison Prisoners prisoner votes Prisons privacy Professional Discipline Property proportionality prosecutions Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries quarantine Radicalisation rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania round-up Round Up Royals Russia saudi arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice Secret trials sexual offence shamima begum Sikhism Smoking social media social workers South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing starvation statelessness stem cells stop and search Strasbourg super injunctions Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance sweatshops Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture travel treason treaty accession trial by jury TTIP Turkey Twitter UK Ukraine universal credit universal jurisdiction unlawful detention USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wildlife wind farms WomenInLaw Worboys wrongful birth YearInReview Zimbabwe

Disclaimer


This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.

%d bloggers like this: