A weed is a plant in the wrong place

29 September 2017 by

... and pests are misplaced animals. We are all too familiar with the stories of mayhem caused by urban foxes released into the countryside, and the collapse in property value where Japanese knotweed is found to have invaded. The perpetrators of such damage are rarely identified and brought to account. So it is with a level of glee that the prosecution of two “Buddhist activists” has been reported in the media after they released nearly a thousand alien crustaceans off the coast of Brighton.

“Banker” Ni Li and “estate agent” Zhixong Li bought the live American lobsters and Dungeness crabs from a London fish merchant, hired three boats from Brighton Marina and cast the animals adrift as part of a religious ceremony, fangsheng, which is understood to be the cause of many ecosystem disruptions in Asia.

This short story is so replete with topical issues it is hard to know where to begin.

The reporting, for a start: the reference to the devotees’ day jobs drives off any possible sympathy we may have for their cause. No eco-pilgrims they, but grasping suits in a material world. The headline picture of a lab-coated technician clutching one of the offending crustaceans suggests disease and contamination. The fleet which discovered these foreign invaders are described as “Brighton fishers”, summoning up images of fisherfolk in sou’westers and dinghies, plying their trade amongst native flounders and sole.

What this story does not refer to are much greater plagues, such as the blight of zebra mussels in the lakes of midwest America, brought in their millions on the hulls of transoceanic ships, the decimation of native woodland in northwest Spain and Portugal by eucalyptus plantations, the collapse of native bee colonies under the viral load of introduced pollinators.

The substantive issues are more significant than the reporting suggests. We have learned the lesson, too late, of the catastrophic consequences of moving life forms about to suit our convenience. But it is debatable whether the efforts of government agencies should be dedicated to the prosecution of a few animal liberationists, however misguided. True it is that released mink ravage the French countryside, but their presence in Western Europe was the fault of the fashion trade, not a few eco-warriors. The American crustaceans didn’t swim to London. They probably arrived in a container ship whose hull was thick with zebra mussels.

The provision under which this banker and estate agent were convicted was Section 14 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act. This prevents

the release or escape into the wild of any animal that is not an ordinary resident or a visitor.

Given that the “wild” in this case was a local industrial fishery and shipping lane (the English Channel), and that the animals introduced to it had been lawfully imported to another form of fish containment, a tank in a fish merchants’, it seems illogical to blame the invasion on a small crackpot enterprise. The industry that the fangsheng tradition has triggered in the far east – of capturing wild animals in order that Buddhists may earn karma by releasing them – is no nastier than industrial farming.

Perhaps a price tag on foreign lobster meat would be more effective in protecting local populations from alien invasion.

Related reading:


  1. I think these people had hearts in the right place.

  2. NMac says:

    That such creatures are sold live is appalling. 37 years ago I decided to go vegetarian. I have never ever regretted it.

  3. faolan says:

    So if my parrot escapes, I can be prosecuted?.
    Years ago, living near the coast, there was a fishmonger who displayed Live lobsters in his shop window, it was a scorching hot day, and the sun was beating down on the glass mercilessly, I’m sure they would have loved to be liberated, and put back in the sea.

Welcome to the UKHRB

This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.




This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.


Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption ALBA Al Qaeda animal rights anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 Artificial Intelligence Asbestos assisted suicide asylum Australia autism benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery Catholicism Chagos Islanders Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners climate change clinical negligence Coercion common law confidentiality consent conservation constitution contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus costs Court of Protection crime Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation deportation deprivation of liberty Detention disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Family Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage Gaza genetics Germany Google Grenfell Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests international law internet Inuit Iran Iraq Ireland Islam Israel Italy IVF Japan Judaism judicial review jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid Leveson Inquiry LGBTQ Rights liability Libel Liberty Libya Lithuania local authorities marriage mental capacity Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery music Muslim nationality national security NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury Piracy Plagiarism planning Poland Police Politics pollution press Prisoners Prisons privacy Professional Discipline Property proportionality Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania Round Up Royals Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice sexual offence Sikhism Smoking social media South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing statelessness stop and search Strasbourg Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture travel treaty TTIP Turkey UK Ukraine USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wind farms WomenInLaw YearInReview Zimbabwe
%d bloggers like this: