Maggots, sewage, bats, butterflies and Brexit

24 March 2017 by

Leigh Day and the Human Rights Lawyers Association  hosted a full house on Wednesday 22 March when Claire McGregor and David Hart QC from 1 Crown Office Row joined Sarah Sackman from Francis Taylor Building, Adrienne Copithorne from Richard Buxton LLP and Rebekah Read from Leigh Day to speak about how to become an environmental lawyer.

The audience heard how on her first day working in environmental law, Claire McGregor boarded a plane to the Ivory Coast to work on the Trafigura case involving 30,000 claimants suing oil multinational Trafigura for compensation following a toxic oil spill. The case went on to become the largest group litigation case in the UK. More recently she has been involved in group litigation concerning odours from an animal by-products rendering plant. There has been animal processing on site for more than 100 years, with early uses involving maggot breeding; before the First World War, it was thought that the fumes of the maggotorium cured common ailments.  Today it converts animal carcass into useful proteins.

Adrienne Copithorne was drawn to environmental law as an ideal combination of public law and land law. She described cases as diverse as judicially reviewing planning permissions in order to prevent cockle harvest decline, challenging London park closures for ticketed music festivals, and acting for the owners of a large country estate affected by noise from RAF Harrier jets.

For Sarah Sackman, the bread and butter of environmental law practice was less about being Erin Brockovich and more likely to involve sewage, bats and butterflies. To be effective you need to consider regulatory, EU, public and criminal law, and to be able to use them creatively. Describing environmental law as engaging socio-economic collective rights more often than human rights, its importance lies in ensuring that decisions affecting the environment include public participation and consideration of sound evidence.

Rebekah Read spoke about her experience working on the Shell Niger Delta case, which involved claims brought in the UK on behalf of two Nigerian communities who suffered following large scale oil spills from the energy company’s pipelines in the Niger Delta. The case settled in 2015 for £55 million damages.

David Hart QC cited site visits as one of the many perks of being an environmental lawyer – including his experience staring into an electrostatic precipitator in a disused power station, and more recently inspecting shingly beaches and being treated to a fully-foraged meal afterwards. He is currently working on claims for damages for the loss of property values caused by Japanese knotweed.

A lively question and answer followed. Discussing the likely effect of Brexit and the Great Repeal Bill on environmental law, Sarah Sackman suggested that the real risk would be the political temptation to cut “green” tape in order to fast track infrastructure projects in pursuit of economic growth, at the cost of environmental protections. David Hart thought that although the system of EU-inspired environmental impact assessment would survive, the EU’s strict habitat protection laws may be vulnerable to attack from pro-business political interests.

For those keen to practice in the area, many of the speakers underlined the need to have an intellectual curiosity for the science underpinning a particular environmental law case, a willingness to engage with complex legal issues and a desire to work for a wide variety of clients. The panel encouraged anyone interested in a career in the area to sign up to the UK Environmental Law Association, and the Environmental Law Foundation.

The last word went to environmental law expert Richard Buxton, who suggested that beauty could be found in small cases and cautioned against proceeding through your career with too specific a set of objectives in mind.

For more information about the environmental law work that 1 Crown Office Row does, click here. For details about upcoming HRLA events and details of how to join click here.

1 comment;

  1. Bernard Wood says:


    Sent from my iPhone


Comments are closed.

Welcome to the UKHRB

This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.




Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption AI air pollution air travel ALBA Allergy Al Qaeda Amnesty International animal rights Animals Anne Sacoolas anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 article 263 TFEU Artificial Intelligence Asbestos Assange assisted suicide asylum asylum seekers Australia autism badgers benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery British Waterways Board care homes Catholic Church Catholicism Chagos Islanders Charter of Fundamental Rights child protection Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners civil partnerships climate change clinical negligence closed material procedure Coercion Commission on a Bill of Rights common law communications competition confidentiality consent conservation constitution contact order contact tracing contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus costs costs budgets Court of Protection crime criminal law Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation DEFRA deportation deprivation of liberty derogations Detention Dignitas diplomacy diplomatic relations disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Equality Act 2010 Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Convention on Human Rights European Court of Human Rights European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Facebook Facial Recognition Family Fatal Accidents Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office foreign policy France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage gay rights Gaza Gender genetics Germany Google Grenfell Gun Control hague convention Harry Dunn Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Human Rights Watch Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests insurance international law internet inuit Iran Iraq Ireland islam Israel Italy IVF ivory ban Japan joint enterprise judaism judicial review Judicial Review reform Julian Assange jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid legal aid cuts Leveson Inquiry lgbtq liability Libel Liberty Libya lisbon treaty Lithuania local authorities marriage Media and Censorship mental capacity Mental Capacity Act Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery morocco murder music Muslim nationality national security naturism neuroscience NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges nuisance Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury physician assisted death Piracy Plagiarism planning planning system Poland Police Politics Pope press prison Prisoners prisoner votes Prisons privacy procurement Professional Discipline Property proportionality prosecutions prostituton Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries quarantine Radicalisation refugee rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania round-up Round Up Royals Russia saudi arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice Secret trials sexual offence shamima begum Sikhism Smoking social media social workers South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing starvation statelessness stem cells stop and search Strasbourg super injunctions Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance sweatshops Syria Tax technology Terrorism The Round Up tort Torture travel treason treaty accession trial by jury TTIP Turkey Twitter UK Ukraine universal credit universal jurisdiction unlawful detention USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Weekly Round-up Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wildlife wind farms WomenInLaw Worboys wrongful birth YearInReview Zimbabwe


This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.

%d bloggers like this: