GTMO hunger strike and DWP make-believe

24 August 2015 by

Photo credit: Guardian

Photo credit: Guardian

Alex Wessely brings you the latest Round-up.

In the news

Guantanamo Bay was back in the headlines this week, after the Obama administration responded to a legal request to free a hunger-striking detainee “entirely in secret”. Tariq Ba Odah has refused to eat voluntarily since 2007, and now weighs a “shockingly frail”  74.5 pounds (33.8kg).

Tariq, who was 23 when first detained, has never been charged with a crime, and in 2010 a US task force concluded he could be released without posing a risk to the US. His lawyers filed a habeas corpus petition  in June, and the long-awaited response by the US Justice Department was released on Friday: it simply read “sealed opposition”.

The Guardian reports that this is probably the first instance of a “secret” opposition to a writ of habeus corpus, and that Tariq’s lawyers are surprised and angry, calling Obama’s plans to close Guantanamo an “incoherent mess”.

Amnesty have called for his “immediate release” , citing his “deeply concerning” health (a doctor who examined him compared his state to that of a late-stage AIDS or cancer patient), as has the Center for Constitutional Rights. Human Rights Watch calls the US government’s decision “deeply disappointing”, aimed at shielding the government from embarrassment rather than protecting national security. Tariq remains defiant: “Protesting by hunger striking is the only way to communicate [to those with freedom] what it means to be unjustly detained, to be put in a cell for over a decade without charge”

Other news:

  • Legal Aid Strike: after 52 days, the Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association and the London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association have released a joint statement announcing the suspension of the so-called legal aid strike. This, according to the statement, is a “gesture of goodwill” in relation to continuing negotiations, although the Law Society Gazette reports “mixed reactions” from lawyers across the country, as does Legal Cheek here.
  • Human Rights Watch points to a surge in unlawful Palestinian home demolitions, with 126 Palestinians having been left homeless following demolitions last week.
  • 441 cases of human rights violations went unpunished in Darfur in 2014 – the UN.
  • The DWP have been left red-faced after admitting inventing quotes from fake ‘benefit claimants’ for a sanctions leaflet. This came to light after some astute Freedom of Information Requests made by Welfare Weekly. Matters got worse for Iain Duncan Smith’s department, when it emerged that one fake claimant, ‘Zac’, had previously appeared in other literature.


A case involving compensation for a minor road traffic accident may have far-reaching consequences for solicitors’ success fees, and reveals an unintended consequence of the cuts to legal aid.

The claimants, two children involved in a collision with a Royal Mail vehicle, were awarded around two thousand pounds each, in an entirely predictable settlement. However, changes to legal aid funding meant their father (and litigation friend) was required to pay their solicitors £1,865 in respect of a success fee and an after-the-event (ATE) insurance premium.

District Judge Lumb reacted angrily to suggestions that not charging a success fee would make such work “uneconomical”, as well as castigating the children’s solicitors for taking out ATE insurance in such a low-risk case. The ruling, and the doubt it cases on personal injury lawyers’ model of recovering fees is discussed here, and here by Joshua Rozenburg – who concludes that all this would have been prevented in the previous legal aid model, and that the subsequent scrapping of legal aid in these areas has created a “classic false economy [which] has cost us all much more than it ever saved”.


If you would like your event to be mentioned on the Blog, please email the details to Jim Duffy, at

Welcome to the UKHRB

This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.




This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.


Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption ALBA Al Qaeda animal rights anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 Artificial Intelligence Asbestos assisted suicide asylum Australia autism benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery Catholicism Chagos Islanders Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners climate change clinical negligence Coercion common law confidentiality consent conservation constitution contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus costs Court of Protection crime Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation deportation deprivation of liberty Detention disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Family Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage Gaza genetics Germany Google Grenfell Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests international law internet Inuit Iran Iraq Ireland Islam Israel Italy IVF Japan Judaism judicial review jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid Leveson Inquiry LGBTQ Rights liability Libel Liberty Libya Lithuania local authorities marriage mental capacity Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery music Muslim nationality national security NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury Piracy Plagiarism planning Poland Police Politics pollution press Prisoners Prisons privacy Professional Discipline Property proportionality Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania Round Up Royals Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice sexual offence Sikhism Smoking social media South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing statelessness stop and search Strasbourg Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture travel treaty TTIP Turkey UK Ukraine USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wind farms WomenInLaw YearInReview Zimbabwe
%d bloggers like this: