Round-up: Obama in Africa, and Supreme Court on solitary confinement

3 August 2015 by

2015-07-africa-kenya-kenyatta-obamaIn the news:

President Obama made a historic trip to Kenya this week, and called upon African states to abandon anti-gay discrimination (watch the full speech here). In a speech welcomed by Human Rights Campaign, he urged Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta to stop treating people differently based on their sexuality, comparing the effects of this to racial segregation in early 20th century America.

In a separate speech, he stated that there is “no excuse” for treating women as second-class citizens, and called for an end to female genital mutilation (FGM) and child marriage.

President Kenyatta rebuffed the idea of legalising homosexuality in Kenya, stating “there are some things that we must admit we don’t share” and claimed gay rights are a “non-issue” in the minds of most Kenyans (a viewpoint supported by other leading Kenyan politicians).

Obama has also been criticised for visiting Ethiopia on the same trip – becoming the first sitting US President to do so. Ethiopia has a history of human rights abuses and a high corruption index (the ruling party won 100% of seats in a recent election), and Human Rights Watch argued that Obama’s visit would give the government a legitimacy which it “does not deserve”. Obama used the trip to encourage Ethiopia to ease their restrictions on free speech, among other issues.

Other news:

  • Nonhuman Rights Project: A New York judge has denied an attempt to have legal personhood recognised in chimpanzees, although admitting she thought that one day this might happen. NhRP argued that chimpanzees, as highly intelligent, autonomous animals, have a right not to be imprisoned against their will. Judge Jaffe was sympathetic to this argument (read the judgement here), but was ultimately bound by precedent. However, NhRP are appealing and claim a partial victory: Steven Wise, the lead attorney, argues the judgement shows “you don’t have to be a human being to be a ‘person’”.
  • “As many as 20” experienced magistrates have resigned in protest over a reform whereby convicted offenders have to pay punitive charges of up to £1,200. The reform, introduced by the last chancellor Chris Grayling, was intended to help cover the costs of the criminal justice system by encouraging an early guilty plea; however it has been label “a farce”, as courts are imposing fines that they know will never be collected, as well as putting pressure on innocent people to plead guilty.
  • Albie Sachs, a respected South African judge and anti-apartheid activist, has warned Britain against leaving the ECHR, citing a possible “domino effect”, for example encouraging South Africa to withdraw from the International Criminal Court.
  • A United Nations report has suggested that Britain should ban parents from smacking their children; Education Secretary Nicky Morgan responded saying this is an area where “we don’t want to criminalise parents”.
  • Human Rights Watch has demanded Turkmenistan to immediately release a journalist who has been “secretly detained for weeks”.
  • The Court of Appeal has agreed that Detained Fast Track appeals are inherently unfair.

In the courts:

The two appellants are prisoners who had been kept in solitary confinement for unbroken periods of several months, despite the lawful maximum being 14 days at a time, and only if authorised by the Secretary of State. The Supreme Court unanimously concluded that these confinements had been conducted unlawfully, and that the system is procedurally unfair:

“The imposition of prolonged periods of solitary confinement on the basis of what are, in substance, secret and unchallengeable allegations is, or should be, unacceptable.” [Lord Reed]

Publiclawforeveryone calls this judgement a “progressive step” and has an in-depth analysis of the Carltona Doctrine (can a prison warden exercise some of the powers of a Secretary of State?). The case is also analysed by Frances Cook, Chief Executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform.

by Alex Wessely


  • Justice Human Rights Conference, 12th October 2015 – see here for the full programme and application details.

UKHRB posts

If you would like your event to be mentioned on the Blog, please email the details to Jim Duffy, at

1 comment;

  1. daveyone1 says:

    Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..

Welcome to the UKHRB

This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.




This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.


Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption ALBA Al Qaeda animal rights anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 Artificial Intelligence Asbestos assisted suicide asylum Australia autism benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery Catholicism Chagos Islanders Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners climate change clinical negligence Coercion common law confidentiality consent conservation constitution contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus costs Court of Protection crime Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation deportation deprivation of liberty Detention disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Family Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage Gaza genetics Germany Google Grenfell Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests international law internet Inuit Iran Iraq Ireland Islam Israel Italy IVF Japan Judaism judicial review jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid Leveson Inquiry LGBTQ Rights liability Libel Liberty Libya Lithuania local authorities marriage mental capacity Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery music Muslim nationality national security NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury Piracy Plagiarism planning Poland Police Politics pollution press Prisoners Prisons privacy Professional Discipline Property proportionality Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania Round Up Royals Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice sexual offence Sikhism Smoking social media South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing statelessness stop and search Strasbourg Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture travel treaty TTIP Turkey UK Ukraine USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wind farms WomenInLaw YearInReview Zimbabwe
%d bloggers like this: