Interested in human rights? Work with Liberty!

2 September 2013 by

imageLiberty, the human rights organisation, is looking for qualified and qualifying lawyers to staff its advice line.

This is a great opportunity –  you can trust me on that, as I did it for a year whilst I was a pupil barrister. I learned a huge amount about practical human rights issues, as well as meeting some great people. The advice line  provides an essential service to those who are unlikely to be able to obtain advice anywhere else.

All details after the break below, and on this flyer (PDF).

Are you interested in human rights? Would you like to work with Liberty?

Liberty is one of the UK’s leading human rights and civil liberties organisations. We carry out test case litigation and interventions, lobby Parliament, campaign on a wide range of issues, and provide advice and information to the general public.

Liberty operates a telephone advice line for members of the public to call to obtain advice and information about their human rights. We are now seeking new volunteers from the legal community to help us with this important pro bono work.

When it is

We currently need more volunteers to cover the evening sessions on Monday and Thursday evening from 6:30pm to 8:30pm.

Where it is

Liberty’s offices are on Strutton Ground, London, SW1P 2HR (nearest tubes are St James’s Park, Westminster and Victoria).

Who does it

The advice line is staffed by a pool of volunteers – solicitors, barristers, pupils and trainees. A Liberty staff member will always be available to provide information and assistance with calls. Unfortunately, the terms of our insurance mean that we are unable to accept paralegals or students as volunteers.

What you would do

Volunteers simply turn up on the required evening to take calls and provide appropriate human rights advice. The advice is given on a one-off basis and generally no further correspondence is entered into.

While the line is primarily a human rights advice line we receive a broad range of legal enquiries on diverse issues spanning criminal and civil law. Some queries raise human rights issues and some do not. However we always try to give advice or provide referrals as appropriate. Liberty will sometimes request that the caller write in providing further details if we feel that there is a case we are interested in taking on.

How it works

The advice line is a very flexible way to volunteer. Every month volunteers receive an email asking if they are available for one evening the following month. If they are available they email back specifying which evening they would like to attend. If they are not available for that month they simply do not email back.

If you would like to volunteer on the advice line or are interested in finding out more, please email Katy Watts at


  1. Lawyers are not social science analysts. I am a not corrupt argentine forensic professional on Linguistics and Social Semiotics. The issue involves linguistics matters are stereotypes, discriminations, etc have a discoursive support. Should a forensic on my areas be of eny help, you are most welcome.

  2. busybeebuzz says:

    Liberty is a fabulous campaign group run on a shoe string. If I had a law qualification I would be honoured to do this, but unfortunately I did philosophy. I would encourage anyone with a law degree and an interest in human rights to do this. As a member I can tell you that they are a great bunch of people and guarantee that you will learn a lot, As an unemployed disabled person it only costs me £1 per month to be a member for which I receive enough information to write some really mean letters to my local MP..

  3. Andrew says:

    Any resemblance to an unpaid internship is of couse entirely coincidental.

    Everybody’s doing it, doing it, doing it.

    1. Jon says:

      Andrew – you wrote “coincidental” but I think you meant to write “non-existent”. Volunteering to answer phones for maybe a couple of hours in an evening once a month (if you happen to be free and fancy it) is nothing like an unpaid internship.

Comments are closed.

Welcome to the UKHRB

This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.




Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption AI air pollution air travel ALBA Allergy Al Qaeda Amnesty International animal rights Animals Anne Sacoolas anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 article 263 TFEU Artificial Intelligence Asbestos Assange assisted suicide asylum asylum seekers Australia autism badgers benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery British Waterways Board care homes Catholic Church Catholicism Chagos Islanders Charter of Fundamental Rights child protection Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners civil partnerships climate change clinical negligence closed material procedure Coercion Commission on a Bill of Rights common law communications competition confidentiality consent conservation constitution contact order contact tracing contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus coronavirus act 2020 costs costs budgets Court of Protection covid crime criminal law Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation DEFRA deportation deprivation of liberty derogations Detention Dignitas diplomacy diplomatic relations disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Equality Act 2010 Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Convention on Human Rights European Court of Human Rights European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Facebook Facial Recognition Family Fatal Accidents Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office foreign policy France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage gay rights Gaza Gender genetics Germany Google Grenfell Gun Control hague convention Harry Dunn Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Human Rights Watch Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests insurance international law internet inuit Iran Iraq Ireland islam Israel Italy IVF ivory ban Japan joint enterprise judaism judicial review Judicial Review reform Julian Assange jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid legal aid cuts Leveson Inquiry lgbtq liability Libel Liberty Libya lisbon treaty Lithuania local authorities marriage Media and Censorship mental capacity Mental Capacity Act Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery morocco murder music Muslim nationality national security naturism neuroscience NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges nuisance Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury physician assisted death Piracy Plagiarism planning planning system Poland Police Politics Pope press prison Prisoners prisoner votes Prisons privacy procurement Professional Discipline Property proportionality prosecutions prostituton Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries quarantine Radicalisation refugee rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania round-up Round Up Royals Russia saudi arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice Secret trials sexual offence shamima begum Sikhism Smoking social media social workers South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing starvation statelessness stem cells stop and search Strasbourg super injunctions Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance sweatshops Syria Tax technology Terrorism The Round Up tort Torture travel treason treaty accession trial by jury TTIP Turkey Twitter UK Ukraine universal credit universal jurisdiction unlawful detention USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Weekly Round-up Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wildlife wind farms WomenInLaw Worboys wrongful birth YearInReview Zimbabwe


This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.

%d bloggers like this: