Judges on Same-Sex Marriage, and a Bit of a Recap – The Human Rights Roundup

31 December 2012 by


Another judge speaks out

Welcome back to the UK Human Rights Roundup, your weekly bulletin of human rights news. The full list of links can be found here. You can also find our previous roundups here.

by Daniel Isenberg

A relatively quiet news-week in the world of human rights, with judges and politicians having (in some cases) a well-earned break.  Same-sex marriage managed to remain in the headlines with High Court Judge, Sir Paul Coleridge, saying it was a ‘minority issue’.  Looking back over the past few weeks there has been some recent interesting commentary on the European Court of Human Rights’ decision against Macedonia; as well as the domestic High Court’s ruling on Scientology.  Finally, a pair of articles on the historical and recent relationship between Jews and human rights.

You may also notice that the UK Human Rights Blog has a slightly refreshed design – please do send us your comments if you have any. If you are looking for some new year’s reading, why not try:

In the news

High Court Judge on Same-Sex Marriage

High Court Judge Sir Paul Coleridge weighed in on the debate about same-sex marriage this week, arguing that this was a “minority issue” and government policy should, instead, be focusing on a broader breakdown of the institution of marriage within Britain.  Meanwhile, head of the Catholic Church in Britain, Archbishop of Westminster Vincent Nichols, has told the BBC the government had “no mandate” to advance its plans on same-sex marriage legislation.

Sir Paul recently agreed to take a “lower profile role” in his Marriage Foundation as this would be “more appropriate for a serving judicial office holder.”  This followed a complaint to the Office for Judicial Complaints.

This news dragged Pink Tape blogger Lucy Reed away from Johnny Depp on television, to provide her thoughts on the issue, criticising Sir Paul’s unwillingness to take a substantive position in favour or against same-sex marriage, per se.

You May Recall…

A few items in the news this week, harking back to some earlier human rights news.  Firstly, André Nollkaemper on the European Journal of International Law Blog provides his commentary on the recent European Court of Human Rights decision, holding Macedonia culpable for the mistreatment of Khaled El-Masri.  Nollkaemper does not question the conclusion of the court, but raises that the Court has taken a new approach in holding Macedonia responsible not only for its own wrongdoing, but in part for the wrongdoing of the American authorities after it transferred custody of El-Masri.

Last week saw the publication by the CPS of interim guidance on prosecution for misuse of social media (see Adam Wagner’s post here).  Subsequently, the BBC has reported a massive eight-fold increase in ‘social media crimes’ over four years, offering some context as to why the new guidance has come into being.

James Wilson has also commented on the recent High Court decision involving the Church of Scientology (see Rosalind English’s post here).  Wilson proposes that the courts are not suited to deciding upon religious claims such as these, and instead the marriage system would be better served were it run along French lines, where a simple set of criteria and a fixed fee would be the sole requirements for a marriage certificate.

Professor David Feldman, former Legal Adviser to the Parliamentary Joint Select Committee on Human Rights, has jotted down his initial thoughts on the Commission on a Bill of Rights Final Report (see Adam Wagner’s thoughts and last week’s roundup for further views).  Professor Feldman is encouraged that the report “says nothing” and, whether optimistically or pessimistically, comments that “this is the best for which we could have hoped”.

Also in the News

Two further items of interest, this week: the first of which is use a useful compendium of resources on the Mental Capacity Act provided by The Small Places blog.

Secondly, a two-parter from Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, a former Bill of Rights Commissioner, on the interplay between Judaism, Jews and human rights.  The first article looks at the historical relationship between Jewish scholars and human rights institutions and thought, before touching upon the attitude of human rights institutions to Israel.  Pinto-Duschinsky’s second piece looks more specifically at the place of human rights restitution in post-war Germany and how human rights law may impact on current Jewish (and indeed Muslim) issues of circumcision and ritual slaughter.  He raises an eyebrow at the attitude of our own Adam Wagner on the interplay between human rights and the holocaust. Adam’s comment piece in the Jewish Chronicle can be found here and his piece on human rights and the Holocaust here.

In the courts

KB (Failed asylum seekers and forced returnees) Syria CG [2012] UKUT 426 (IAC)

  • Upper Tribunal issues new country guidance on  Syria: a failed asylum seeker or forced returnee would, in general, on arrival face a real risk of arrest and detention and of serious mistreatment during that detention as a result of imputed political opinion. That is sufficient to qualify for refugee protection.

Upcoming Events

To add events to this list, email Adam Wagner. Please only send events which (i) have their own webpage which can be linked to, and (ii) are relevant to topics covered by the blog.

UKHRB posts

1 comment;

  1. Anne Palmer says:

    The need to apply-urgently- Same Sex Marriage is because of the EU’s Equality Act.

Comments are closed.

Welcome to the UKHRB

This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.




Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption AI air pollution air travel ALBA Allergy Al Qaeda Amnesty International animal rights Animals Anne Sacoolas anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 article 263 TFEU Artificial Intelligence Asbestos Assange assisted suicide asylum asylum seekers Australia autism badgers benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery British Waterways Board care homes Catholic Church Catholicism Chagos Islanders Charter of Fundamental Rights child protection Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners civil partnerships climate change clinical negligence closed material procedure Coercion Commission on a Bill of Rights common law communications competition confidentiality consent conservation constitution contact order contact tracing contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus coronavirus act 2020 costs costs budgets Court of Protection covid crime criminal law Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation DEFRA deportation deprivation of liberty derogations Detention Dignitas diplomacy diplomatic relations disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Equality Act 2010 Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Convention on Human Rights European Court of Human Rights European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Facebook Facial Recognition Family Fatal Accidents Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office foreign policy France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage gay rights Gaza Gender genetics Germany Google Grenfell Gun Control Harry Dunn Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Human Rights Watch Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests insurance international law internet inuit Iran Iraq Ireland islam Israel Italy IVF ivory ban Japan joint enterprise judaism judicial review Judicial Review reform Julian Assange jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid legal aid cuts Leveson Inquiry lgbtq liability Libel Liberty Libya lisbon treaty Lithuania local authorities marriage Media and Censorship mental capacity Mental Capacity Act Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery morocco murder music Muslim nationality national security naturism neuroscience NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges nuisance Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury physician assisted death Piracy Plagiarism planning planning system Poland Police Politics Pope press prison Prisoners prisoner votes Prisons privacy procurement Professional Discipline Property proportionality prosecutions prostituton Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries quarantine Radicalisation rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania round-up Round Up Royals Russia saudi arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice Secret trials sexual offence shamima begum Sikhism Smoking social media social workers South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing starvation statelessness stem cells stop and search Strasbourg super injunctions Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance sweatshops Syria Tax technology Terrorism The Round Up tort Torture travel treason treaty accession trial by jury TTIP Turkey Twitter UK Ukraine universal credit universal jurisdiction unlawful detention USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Weekly Round-up Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wildlife wind farms WomenInLaw Worboys wrongful birth YearInReview Zimbabwe


This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.

%d bloggers like this: