More Leveson, Channel Islands Homosexuality and Gay Marriage – The Human Rights Roundup

9 December 2012 by

Douglas-Isle-of-Man-001Welcome back to the UK Human Rights Roundup, your weekly bulletin of human rights news. The full list of links can be found here. You can also find our table of human rights cases here and previous roundups here.

Commentary on the Leveson report is again dominating the blogosphere this week – and once again, there is some discussion on whether the UK should maintain a relationship with Strasbourg. Gay marriage is also back in the news. However, we also have some “new” news, covering such diverse topics as homosexuality in the Channel Islands, “indie lawyers” and legal aid. A quick reminder: tomorrow (Monday 10 December) is Human Rights Day. We will be hosting a guest post which you can read in the morning.

In the news


It is unsurprising that such a weighty tome as the Leveson Report should be a dominant theme in legal blogs for more than one week – as with last week, there is a lot of commentary and I have cherry-picked the most interesting for this roundup. ObiterJ’s take is, as ever, a good place to start. In this post, he explains in simple terms the proposals made by Lord Justice Leveson and why they do not involve actual statutory regulation, but also why some (including the Prime Minister) are concerned that once the principle that statute can be involved in press regulation is conceded, there could be a slippery slope towards more active regulation of the press by the government (which would of course undermine the role of the press in a democracy).

Some other interesting Leveson posts this week:

Homosexuality in the Channel Islands

JURIST columnist Paul Johnson has written a post in two parts on the JURIST website dealing with male homosexuality and the criminal law in Guernsey (first part) and the Isle of Man (second part). The posts explain the surprising range of laws in these jurisdictions (which are associated with the ECHR by their relationship with the UK, but have their own legal systems) which criminalise various homosexual acts (all consensual “buggery” and “gross indecency” not in private is illegal in Guernsey, and homosexual actions remain grounds for dismissing a Guernsey seaman from a merchant ship; the Isle of Man has very similar laws) between consenting male adults. These laws are, of course, relevant from a human rights perspective and Paul Johnson calls for closer international scrutiny of these two jurisdictions.

ECHR or a British Bill of Rights? (Again)

As ever (and especially given that we are now fast approaching the publication of the Commission on a Bill of Rights’ report) the UK’s relationship with Strasbourg is a hot topic for online discussion. This week we have two defences of the Strasbourg Court, both published on the UK Constitutional Law Group blog. The first, by David Feldman, explains exactly why the “unelected foreign judges” at Strasbourg get to tell the Sovereign Parliament what to do (in short, because the UK agreed to be subject to the European Court of Human Rights’ jurisdiction). The second, by David Mead, seeks to explode sundry myths propagated by both sides surrounding the debate over the ECHR, and is therefore highly recommended reading.

On the more specific issue of prisoner voting, Joshua Rozenberg has written a post for the Law Society Gazette in which he explores the government’s options for dealing with the ECHR’s ruling on prisoner voting (and also speculates on the nature of the report which the commission on a Bill of Rights may return) and concludes that the UK’s international standing is at risk (especially if we go down the route of entirely repatriating human rights and sever ties with Strasbourg). Finally, John Rentoul has published a transcript of an interview with Justice Secretary Chris Grayling (BBC 1 Sunday Politics) on the Eagle Eye website, in which Mr. Grayling gives his official (though rather bet-hedging) views both on prisoner voting and the prison system in general.

Gay marriage

The equal marriage debate is back in the news as the Prime Minister has announced his support for gay marriage on religious premises – see Adam Wagner’s post on the legal ramifications of this change of direction. Meanwhile, a number of senior members of the Conservative Party have also said they support a change in the law.

Rise of the Indie Lawyer

Alex Aldridge of Legal Cheek has posted an interesting article this week speculating on the future of the legal profession, in which he predicts an emergence of “indie lawyers” not associated with large firms or chambers setting up using social media once they have completed their pupillages or training contracts. This article comes of the back of Legal Cheek’s Google Campus event this week, which asked the question “What’ll Replace Fading Dreams Of City Law Megabucks And Criminal Bar Glamour?”, featuring a panel which included this blog’s editor Adam Wagner.

Legal Aid in the House of Lords

The government’s proposals for further legal aid restrictions in secondary legislation under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 have been narrowly defeated in the House of Lords, as reported by the BBC here. The Lords backed a motion by Lord Bach (a Labour peer) accusing the government of backtracking on its earlier commitment to allow legal aid to point of law appeals against rulings on welfare benefits.

This post by Elizabeth Davidson on the Legal Voice site explains the situation with respect to the secondary legislation dealing with legal aid for judicial review, homelessness and habeas corpus cases – the Lords passed the Civil Legal Aid (Merits Criteria) Regulations 2012, with a “Regret” motion pointing out concern with Regulation 53(b) (which requires that an applicant must exhaust all other avenues before trying judicial review for the director of legal aid to allow the applicant legal aid – the director has no discretion under this Regulation). The government has promised an amendment to this Regulation in 2013 which will address the Lords’ concerns.

Other Roundups

Two other notable roundups this week: the first, compiled by Emma Wilson on the Legal Voice website, deals with stories connected to access to justice; the second, compiled for Inforrm’s blog by Judith Townend, contains more commentary on the Leveson report, and some non-Leveson related media law stories (including a thorough list of cases and media law stories from other jurisdictions).

In the courts

XY v Facebook Ireland Ltd [2012] NIQB 96 Northern Irish court orders interim injunction requiring removal of “Keeping Our Kids Safe from Predators” Facebook page revealing paedophiles’ home addresses.

El-Masri v. “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (application no. 39630/09) Judgment to be delivered by Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights on December 13th. Case involves purported “secret rendition” of Lebanese-born German national to Afghanistan.

Upcoming Events

The UKHRB now has an additional feature on the right sidebar of the website – the events list. To add events to this list, email Adam Wagner. Please only send events which (i) have their own webpage which can be linked to, and (ii) are relevant to topics covered by the blog.

UKHRB posts

by Sam Murrant


  1. James Wilson says:

    Mrs G – exactly the same answer as with a heterosexual couple: whichever solution is considered to be in the child’s best interest, be that with one parent, the other, or shar custody.

  2. Mrs G says:

    Where a gay couple are married and have an adopted child and later divorce who gets to have the child live with them?

  3. forcedadoption says:

    Justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done;There should be no secret courts (just names of children kept out) and no restrictions on press reporting other than those that exist already plus the laws of libel and slander that do more to protect the “innocent” than any fresh legislation would do .Hypocricy must always be exposed as too many “celebrities” pose as role models but protest when their roles are shown not to be so model after all !

Comments are closed.

Welcome to the UKHRB

This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.




Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption AI air pollution air travel ALBA Allergy Al Qaeda Amnesty International animal rights Animals anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 article 263 TFEU Artificial Intelligence Asbestos Assange assisted suicide asylum asylum seekers Australia autism badgers benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery British Waterways Board care homes Catholic Church Catholicism Chagos Islanders Charter of Fundamental Rights child protection Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners civil partnerships climate change clinical negligence closed material procedure Coercion Commission on a Bill of Rights common law communications competition confidentiality consent conservation constitution contact order contact tracing contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus coronavirus act 2020 costs costs budgets Court of Protection covid crime criminal law Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation DEFRA deportation deprivation of liberty derogations Detention Dignitas diplomacy disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Equality Act 2010 Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Convention on Human Rights European Court of Human Rights European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Facebook Facial Recognition Family Fatal Accidents Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office foreign policy France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage gay rights Gaza Gender genetics Germany Google Grenfell Gun Control Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Human Rights Watch Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests insurance international law internet inuit Iran Iraq Ireland islam Israel Italy IVF ivory ban Japan joint enterprise judaism judicial review Judicial Review reform Julian Assange jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid legal aid cuts Leveson Inquiry lgbtq liability Libel Liberty Libya lisbon treaty Lithuania local authorities marriage Media and Censorship mental capacity Mental Capacity Act Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery morocco murder music Muslim nationality national security naturism neuroscience NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges nuisance Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury physician assisted death Piracy Plagiarism planning planning system Poland Police Politics Pope press prison Prisoners prisoner votes Prisons privacy Professional Discipline Property proportionality prosecutions Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries quarantine Radicalisation rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania round-up Round Up Royals Russia saudi arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice Secret trials sexual offence shamima begum Sikhism Smoking social media social workers South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing starvation statelessness stem cells stop and search Strasbourg super injunctions Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance sweatshops Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture travel treason treaty accession trial by jury TTIP Turkey Twitter UK Ukraine universal credit universal jurisdiction unlawful detention USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wildlife wind farms WomenInLaw Worboys wrongful birth YearInReview Zimbabwe


This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.

%d bloggers like this: