Swearing, hacking and legal aid U-turns? – The Human Rights Roundup

28 November 2011 by

Welcome back to the human rights roundup. Our full list of links can be found here. You can also find our table of human rights cases here and previous roundups here.

by Graeme Hall

In the news

Phone-hacking

The Leveson Inquiry has had a star-studded parade of witnesses and phone hacking has dominated the headlines. This week’s highlights have been comprehensively covered by Inforrm’s Blog here, here and here.

David Allen Green, writing in the New Statesman, remarks that this Inquiry is a boost for democracy as it gives a voice to those who have been at the sharp end of press intrusion – normally all to easily ignored and silenced by papers. Freedom of expression, at least during the Inquiry, is not just the preserve of the press.

Inforrm’s Judith Townsend also picks up on the foibles for the legal profession of live streaming and twitter in court, hoping that one lawyer’s penchant for male celebrities won’t close the court’s digital doors. Conversely, another inquiry – the on-going parliamentary select committee looking into the conduct of News International – was criticised by barrister Prof John Cooper for lacking legal expertise, including forensic cross-examination (though presumably not forensic gazing).

Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (‘LAPSO’)

LASPO, which is making its way through Parliament at the moment, received a prolonged ‘bashing’ by members of the House of Lords this week. A summary of the 54 Lords (and Ladies) who spoke in the 8 hour long debate can be found on the Guardian.

ObiterJ notes that the major injustice with LASPO is not that the budget is being cut, but that legal aid will cease to exist in certain areas of law altogether. Access to justice will primarily depend on the type of legal problem suffered, rather than the merits of the case or the ability to pay. Legal blogger Lucy Reed, in an excellent post, disputes some of the arguments put by the Justice Secretary.

However, as the bill ping-pongs between the Houses, glimpses of hope may be appearing on the horizon given the government’s recent U-turns on the abolition of the Youth Justice Board and Chief Coroner’s post; a move welcomedby piBLAWG’s Laura Johnson, although still disappointed that judicial review will remain the only way of challenging coroners’ decisions.

According to the Daily Mirror, the effect of Lords opposition may be a u-turn bringing clinical negligence cases back within the scope of legal aid.

Swearing OK? F*** off!

The newspapers, senior police officers and politicians were lost for words when the High Court ruled that ‘swearing at police is not a crime’. However, Halsbury’s Law Exchange’s Sarah Lewis has made explicitly clear that although swearing in and of itself is not a crime, it may well constitute a criminal offence depending on the circumstances. In the circumstances of this case, it didn’t. Or at least there was insufficient evidence for a criminal conviction.

With some useful red boxes and a fig-leafed-dash of colourful language, Beneath the Wig outlines the judge’s reasoning, pointing out that the reporting of this case has been, to paraphrase, below par. Maybe the media concerned deserve to go on Adam’s legal naughty step, although it is probably still filled by the Guardian, whose decision allowing Freemen of the Land to contribute to Comment is Free has led David Allen Green to implore legal bloggers, tweeters and podcasters to continue to demystify the law responsibly, thus leaving such ‘quacks’ at the margin of society.

Other roundups

See lawthink’s latest human rights developments in the UK and Charon QC’s Without Prejudice, a discussion with David Alen Green covering Hackgate, Freemen ‘Cod’ Law, Politicisation of judges, Legal Aid and Privacy Law. ObiterJ has also written a post describing the state of play of human rights and access to justice in the UK.

In the courts

Case law commentaries from across the blogosphere

…and don’t forget to take a look at our recent posts:

Welcome to the UKHRB


This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe

Categories


Tags


Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption AI air pollution air travel ALBA Allergy Al Qaeda Amnesty International animal rights Animals anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 article 263 TFEU Artificial Intelligence Asbestos Assange assisted suicide asylum asylum seekers Australia autism badgers benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery British Waterways Board Catholic Church Catholicism Chagos Islanders Charter of Fundamental Rights child protection Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners civil partnerships climate change clinical negligence closed material procedure Coercion Commission on a Bill of Rights common law communications competition confidentiality consent conservation constitution contact order contact tracing contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus costs costs budgets Court of Protection crime criminal law Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation DEFRA deportation deprivation of liberty derogations Detention Dignitas diplomacy disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Equality Act 2010 Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Convention on Human Rights European Court of Human Rights European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Facebook Family Fatal Accidents Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office foreign policy France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage gay rights Gaza Gender genetics Germany Google Grenfell Gun Control Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Human Rights Watch Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests insurance international law internet inuit Iran Iraq Ireland islam Israel Italy IVF ivory ban Japan joint enterprise judaism judicial review Judicial Review reform Julian Assange jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid legal aid cuts Leveson Inquiry lgbtq liability Libel Liberty Libya lisbon treaty Lithuania local authorities marriage Media and Censorship mental capacity Mental Capacity Act Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery morocco murder music Muslim nationality national security naturism neuroscience NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges Obituary parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury physician assisted death Piracy Plagiarism planning planning system Poland Police Politics Pope press prison Prisoners prisoner votes Prisons privacy Professional Discipline Property proportionality Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries quarantine Radicalisation rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania Round Up Royals Russia saudi arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice Secret trials sexual offence Sikhism Smoking social media social workers South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing starvation statelessness stem cells stop and search Strasbourg super injunctions Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture travel treason treaty accession trial by jury TTIP Turkey Twitter UK Ukraine universal credit universal jurisdiction unlawful detention USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wildlife wind farms WomenInLaw Worboys wrongful birth YearInReview Zimbabwe

Disclaimer


This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.

%d bloggers like this: