Gagging, discrimination and asylum benefits – the Human Rights Roundup

19 September 2011 by

Welcome back to the human rights roundup, a regular bulletin of all the law we haven’t quite managed to feature in full blog posts. The full list of links can be found here. You can also find our table of human rights cases here and previous roundups here.

First, if you know an individual, campaign group or NGO which deserves to have its local or national human rights work recognised, nominations for The Liberty Human Rights Award close on 30th September 2011, so there’s still time to get nominating!

by Graeme Hall

In the news

Gagging the press

In an uncompromising piece in the Guardian, Geoffrey Robertson QC attacks the attempt of the Metropolitan Police to use the Official Secrets Act 1989 (OSA) to force the Guardian to disclose its source(s) which revealed the hacking of Milly Dowlers’ phone. Robertson not only describes Scotland Yard’s recourse to the OSA “blunderbuss” as misguided given that there is no evidence of the Guardian “inciting” this information from the police, but he also urges Parliament to revisit the OSA and insert a public interest defence to protect press freedom.

The Law and Lawyers blog assists greatly with understanding the background to this story. Click here for Obiter J’s history to the OSA and here for the potential legal wranglings involved. It is clear from Obiter J and Robertson’s pieces that Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects freedom of expression, will be crucial in any legal proceedings, should it come to that. In the meantime, Robertson’s insistence that the Attorney General must stop this prosecution may well bear fruit as it is reported that not only is pressure increasing on Dominic Grieve but also that the deputy prime minister is sympathetic to the Guardian’s cause.

Finally, see Adam Wagner’s post on this blog from this morning – Official secrets and the powerful disinfectant

Equality and discrimination

The concept of equality, and the role it plays in the UK’s constitution, was recently described by Colm O’Cinneide on the UK Constitutional Law Group blog as “patchy or uncertain [being] usually the result of legislative intervention or the jurisprudence of the European courts” with domestic “common law standards remaining relatively underdeveloped.” Nonetheless, despite its (domestic) shortfalls, equality and anti-discrimination continue to take centre stage in current affairs.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission’s (EHRC) report Hidden in plain sight: Inquiry into disability related harassment has been published. Adam Wagner has produced a summary of the report’s findings here. The report makes seven recommendations including better data, training and support. It also concludes that disability related harassment is “wide spread… largely unseen [and] its seriousness rarely acknowledged”, leaving individuals feeling disempowered, marginalised and excluded.

Equality also raises its head in a case discussed by Tom Hennessey of Halsbury’s Law Exchange. Waterstone’s faces legal challenges after mandating that its workers speak English during work hours. Hennessey notes that discrimination and employment guidelines from one of EHRC’s ancestors, the Commission for Racial Equality, will come into play, and that this case may contain thornier issues than it would seem at first blush.

At the margins

As keen supporters of factually correct reporting, it’s heartening to see the UK Immigration Law Blog outlining the benefits which those seeking asylum are entitled to. The reality of what asylum seekers are expected to live on is sobering, and the misreporting of such entitlements can cause resentment and ill-feeling. So, as the post suggests, complain when you encounter such shoddy journalism.

Liberty has written a blog hailing the Human Rights Act as the foundation for the arrests of those involved in the slavery of vulnerable people at a Travellers’ site in Bedfordshire. It is unnerving that specific laws did not exist to prevent people being held in forced servitude until 2010.

Other roundups:

The Eutopia Law blog has produced a roundup, Seven Days in Europe, summarising the European financial crisis, changes to music royalties and drunk elks, amongst others. The Week That Was roundup reminds us of two important Bills enacted this week; one regarding fixed term parliaments, the other concerning the election of Police Commissioners and the requirement to gain the DPP’s permission to secure an arrest warrant against those suspected of war crimes (see Ministry of Justice press release).

The Law and Lawyers’ Legal Roundup covers a plethora of topical legal areas whilst Liberty continues its Human Rights Act bite-size blog, this week focusing on Article 3: No Torture, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment.

Finally, see Law Think’s regular human rights news roundup, posted this morning.

In the courts:

Case-law commentaries from across the blogosphere:

…and don’t forget our recent posts:

Welcome to the UKHRB


This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe

Categories


Tags


Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption AI air pollution air travel ALBA Allergy Al Qaeda Amnesty International animal rights Animals anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 article 263 TFEU Artificial Intelligence Asbestos Assange assisted suicide asylum asylum seekers Australia autism badgers benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery British Waterways Board Catholic Church Catholicism Chagos Islanders Charter of Fundamental Rights child protection Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners civil partnerships climate change clinical negligence closed material procedure Coercion Commission on a Bill of Rights common law communications competition confidentiality consent conservation constitution contact order contact tracing contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus coronavirus act 2020 costs costs budgets Court of Protection covid crime criminal law Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation DEFRA deportation deprivation of liberty derogations Detention Dignitas diplomacy disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Equality Act 2010 Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Convention on Human Rights European Court of Human Rights European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Facebook Facial Recognition Family Fatal Accidents Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office foreign policy France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage gay rights Gaza Gender genetics Germany Google Grenfell Gun Control Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Human Rights Watch Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests insurance international law internet inuit Iran Iraq Ireland islam Israel Italy IVF ivory ban Japan joint enterprise judaism judicial review Judicial Review reform Julian Assange jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid legal aid cuts Leveson Inquiry lgbtq liability Libel Liberty Libya lisbon treaty Lithuania local authorities marriage Media and Censorship mental capacity Mental Capacity Act Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery morocco murder music Muslim nationality national security naturism neuroscience NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges nuisance Obituary parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury physician assisted death Piracy Plagiarism planning planning system Poland Police Politics Pope press prison Prisoners prisoner votes Prisons privacy Professional Discipline Property proportionality prosecutions Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries quarantine Radicalisation rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania round-up Round Up Royals Russia saudi arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice Secret trials sexual offence shamima begum Sikhism Smoking social media social workers South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing starvation statelessness stem cells stop and search Strasbourg super injunctions Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance sweatshops Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture travel treason treaty accession trial by jury TTIP Turkey Twitter UK Ukraine universal credit universal jurisdiction unlawful detention USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wildlife wind farms WomenInLaw Worboys wrongful birth YearInReview Zimbabwe

Disclaimer


This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.

%d bloggers like this: