Baha Mousa Public Inquiry finds “Corporate failure by MoD”

8 September 2011 by

The 1,400 page final report on the inquiry into the death of Baha Mousa  has been published today after three years of hearings. The chairman of the inquiry, retired Court of Appeal judge Sir William Gage, has condemned members of the 1st Battalion The Queen’s Lancashire Regiment for their “lack of moral courage” to report abuse  and the use of banned interrogation after Mousa died of 93 injuries in British army custody in Basra in 2003.

Mousa was arrested with nine other Iraqi men after 1QLR soldiers found weapons, fake ID cards and military clothing at the hotel where he was working as a receptionist. 

The inquiry concluded that his death was caused by a combination of his weakened physical state and a final struggle with his guards. It also found that interrogation techniques were used against Mousa and the other detainees that were unlawful by reason of the Geneva Convention,  including hooding, which had been specifically ordered by a senior officer in Basra. They also suffered other interrogation techniques specifically outlawed by the British Government in 1972, including sleep deprivation, being denied food and drink, being subjected to white noise and being made to stand in painful ”stress positions”.

Sir William Gage condemned the absence of any “proper MoD doctrine on interrogation”.  Although the unit’s senior commander has been acquitted of having any knowledge of the beatings, the chairman said that he ought to have appreciated the dangers of “conditioning”. The commander of the unit responsible for guarding the prisoners is singled out for having committed “very serious breach of duty” for failing to report the treatment of the detainees.

The report finds a situation of “corporate failure” by the MoD to adopt a proper and consistent doctrine for the permissible interrogation and treatment of prisoners of war. Gage summed up his findings thus:

My judgment is that they constituted an appalling episode of serious, gratuitous violence on civilians which resulted in the death of one man and injuries to others. They represent a very serious breach of discipline by a number of members of 1QLR

The Crown Prosecution Service is studying the report to determine whether to take action against any of the individuals involved.

Neil Garnham QC, David Evans, Matthew Donmall, Isabel McArdle, Adam Wagner, Caroline Cross and Kate Beattie of 1 Crown Office Row represented soldier witnesses in the inquiry


Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS

More on this topic:


1 comment;


  1. Hugh Murphy says:

    A very fair ruling by Sir William Gage – he should now investigate NIHRC where he will also find “a lack of moral courage” in the failure to report on the denial of Human Rights to Belfast Dockers Dying from Asbestosis

Welcome to the UKHRB


This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe

Categories


Disclaimer


This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.

Tags


Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption ALBA Al Qaeda animal rights anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 Artificial Intelligence Asbestos assisted suicide asylum Australia autism benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery Catholicism Chagos Islanders Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners climate change clinical negligence Coercion common law confidentiality consent conservation constitution contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus costs Court of Protection crime Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation deportation deprivation of liberty Detention disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Family Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage Gaza genetics Germany Google Grenfell Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests international law internet Inuit Iran Iraq Ireland Islam Israel Italy IVF Japan Judaism judicial review jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid Leveson Inquiry LGBTQ Rights liability Libel Liberty Libya Lithuania local authorities marriage mental capacity Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery music Muslim nationality national security NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury Piracy Plagiarism planning Poland Police Politics pollution press Prisoners Prisons privacy Professional Discipline Property proportionality Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania Round Up Royals Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice sexual offence Sikhism Smoking social media South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing statelessness stop and search Strasbourg Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture travel treaty TTIP Turkey UK Ukraine USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wind farms WomenInLaw YearInReview Zimbabwe
%d bloggers like this: