Twitter reveals, more privacy, drug courts – The Human Rights Roundup

31 May 2011 by

It’s time for the human rights roundup, a regular bulletin of all the law we haven’t quite managed to feature in full blog posts. The full list of links, updated each day, can be found here. Happy post Bank Holiday reading!

by Graeme Hall

In the news:

Whilst the Neuberger Committee’s report is arguably the best place to kick-off any discussion on privacy, freedom of expression and Super-Injunctions, it is not, as Inforrm’s blog concludes, the “last word” on the matter. Indeed, this “overinflated topic” has been tackled with such gusto by the press and blogosphere that the High Court clearly gave a yellow card for “widespread disobedience“.

The Superior Court of California’s recently reported decision forcing Twitter to hand over the details of its users to South Tyneside Council is also potentially important. However, to save falling foul of our many readers who believe that the press has dined out far too much on this topic, a selection of recent press and blog news items is included for you to pick and choose à la carte and digest at your leisure:

The Small Places blog has an instructive piece about the differing legal requirements for those lacking capacity who are deprived of their liberty in hospitals, as against those living in care homes. Whilst direct comparison between incapacity law and the celebrity world of Super-Injunctions may seem to be a long-shot, Alasdair Henderson’s recent post shows that privacy is a live issue here, too.

Jon Robins remarks on the positive outcome the piloted family drug and addiction court is having on keeping together families blighted by addiction. Nonetheless, with funding secured for only another year, this article is a timely reminder of the potentially catastrophic impact legal aid budget cuts will have, both on the most vulnerable and society as a whole. If you are interested in specialist courts, see Adam Wagner’s post from September on mental health courts.

And last but by no means least, a hearty congratulations to the winners of the Young Human Rights Reporter of the Year 2011 competition; a competition for seven to 14 year olds run jointly by the Guardian and Amnesty International UK. Click here for the winners and the shortlisted candidates.

Another detailed roundup of human rights law news can be found on the Law Think Blog.

In the courts:

Shoesmith, R (on the application of) v OFSTED & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 642 (27 May 2011)Direction under Education Act 1996 to remove Director of Children’s Services was unlawful as did not follow fair procedure – See posts by Obiter J and Adam Wagner

Bashir, R (on the application of) v The Independent Adjudicator [2011] EWHC 1108 (Admin)Prison rules conviction for failure to provide urine sample quashed as Muslim prisoner legitimately fasting before court appearance. Article 9 breached – see this case note from Garden Court North chambers

Sultan of Pahang, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 616 (25 May 2011): Sultan of Pahang not entitled to diplomatic immunity as Pahang is sultanate of Malaysia, not a state for purpose of immigration rules.

CTB v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 1334 (QB) (23 May 2011): Footballer privacy injunction maintained despite his name being revealed in Parliament – to prevent harassment by press.

CD v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1273 (Admin) (20 May 2011): Forced relocation of terrorist suspect from London to Rochdale under control order was lawful, but Home Office must pay travel costs for family visits.

Shepherd Masimba Kambadzi (previously referred to as SK (Zimbabwe)) (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 23: Supreme Court rules detention of foreign national prisoner unlawful as Home Office failed to review regularly. Entitled to damages claim. Our coverage coming soon.

Fraser (Appellant) v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 24: Nat Fraser murder conviction quashed. Court applied wrong test for unfair trial. Remitted to Scots court on question of retrial.

FA (Iraq) (FC) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant): Supreme Court refers humanitarian protection appeal rights question to Court of Justice of European Union. See Rosalind English and Adam Wagner’s coverage

Bryant & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 1314 (Admin) (23 May 2011): Arguable case that article 8 ECHR (right to privacy) obliges police to inform victims of phone hacking. Permission to JR granted.

CTB v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 1326 (QB) (23 May 2011) : High Court refuse to vary Imogen Thomas privacy injunction despite widespread speculation of identity in social media.

Buglife, R (on the application of) v Natural England [2011] EWHC 746 (Admin) (30 March 2011): Important environmental high court decision. 3 month and “promptly” Judicial Review time limit contrary to Euro law. Not necessary to bring enviro claims promptly as long as within 3 months. See David Hart QC’s post.

Finally, remember to take a look at our recent posts:

Welcome to the UKHRB

This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.




Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption AI air pollution air travel ALBA Allergy Al Qaeda Amnesty International animal rights Animals Anne Sacoolas anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 article 263 TFEU Artificial Intelligence Asbestos Assange assisted suicide asylum asylum seekers Australia autism badgers benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery British Waterways Board care homes Catholic Church Catholicism Chagos Islanders Charter of Fundamental Rights child protection Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners civil partnerships climate change clinical negligence closed material procedure Coercion Commission on a Bill of Rights common law communications competition confidentiality consent conservation constitution contact order contact tracing contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus coronavirus act 2020 costs costs budgets Court of Protection covid crime criminal law Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation DEFRA deportation deprivation of liberty derogations Detention Dignitas diplomacy diplomatic relations disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Equality Act 2010 Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Convention on Human Rights European Court of Human Rights European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Facebook Facial Recognition Family Fatal Accidents Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office foreign policy France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage gay rights Gaza Gender genetics Germany Google Grenfell Gun Control hague convention Harry Dunn Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Human Rights Watch Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests insurance international law internet inuit Iran Iraq Ireland islam Israel Italy IVF ivory ban Japan joint enterprise judaism judicial review Judicial Review reform Julian Assange jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid legal aid cuts Leveson Inquiry lgbtq liability Libel Liberty Libya lisbon treaty Lithuania local authorities marriage Media and Censorship mental capacity Mental Capacity Act Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery morocco murder music Muslim nationality national security naturism neuroscience NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges nuisance Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury physician assisted death Piracy Plagiarism planning planning system Poland Police Politics Pope press prison Prisoners prisoner votes Prisons privacy procurement Professional Discipline Property proportionality prosecutions prostituton Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries quarantine Radicalisation refugee rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania round-up Round Up Royals Russia saudi arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice Secret trials sexual offence shamima begum Sikhism Smoking social media social workers South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing starvation statelessness stem cells stop and search Strasbourg super injunctions Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance sweatshops Syria Tax technology Terrorism The Round Up tort Torture travel treason treaty accession trial by jury TTIP Turkey Twitter UK Ukraine universal credit universal jurisdiction unlawful detention USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Weekly Round-up Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wildlife wind farms WomenInLaw Worboys wrongful birth YearInReview Zimbabwe


This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.

%d bloggers like this: