Human rights news and case-law roundup

17 August 2010 by

Hoovering up the latest human rights news

We recently started adding links to interesting new articles and case-law on the right the sidebar under the heading “Selected news sources”.

As of last week, these articles now appear on our Twitter feed (@ukhumanrightsb) and Facebook fan page too. Below is a quick rundown of some of the most recent stories. The full list of links can be found here.

17 Aug | Privacy law to stop rise in gagging orders by judges – Telegraph: We have posted on the coming libel reform and super-injunctions; Lord Neuberger is leading a review which may, according to the Telegraph, lead to a statutory law of privacy. The Head of Legal Blog queries whether this would be any different from Article 8 of the ECHR in any case.

16 Aug | Angels in America – NYTimes.com: The invariably excellent Frank Rich of the New York Times charts the quick progress of gay rights in America over the past decades, leading to the recent ‘Prop 8’ ruling in California that a ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional (see our post as to whether it could happen here).

16 Aug | BBC News – Can community sentences replace jail? An important question in light of the coming £2bn cuts which the Ministry of Justice is going to make (see our post on the cuts); the money will have to come from somewhere. With prisons accounting for £2bn of expenditure, community sentences could save a lot of money.  Justice Secretary Ken Clarke has already said this is the way he sees things going.

16 May | How EU integration bars the persecuted from finding refuge in Europe | guardian.co.uk: An interesting debate which is part of the Guardian’s new ‘Europe on Trial‘ feature; see our recent posts on the always vexed issue of immigration and asylum. See also Consensus is the right approach for the European court of human rights, which we blogged on here.

14 Aug | Letters: Pernicious dilemma of unpaid internships | The Guardian: Are thousands of the young (and not young) unemployed being hoodwinked into working for free, on the basis of vague promises of future paid work? More importantly, is this a sneaky way around the minimum wage, and is it fair to interns?

13 Aug | Time to stop legal aid tendering process? | New Law Journal: The hugely controversial (in legal circles, at least) recent family legal aid tendering process, which has put many small firms out of business. The Law Society is calling for the tender to be suspended and reevaluated.

13 Aug | Was it right to scrap the ContactPoint child database? |guardian.co.uk: We posted recently on the switching off of the ContactPoint database, and the concerns which remain for child protection (see here). In this article, the director of the Children’s Society argues that the right to privacy should be trumped by child protection in this case, and the database should have remained. A representative of Liberty, the Human Rights organisation, disagrees.

14 Aug | Terror laws overused by police, research suggests | The Law Gazette: The fact that many more people were arrested than convicted do not necessarily mean that the laws were overused. This only makes sense in the context of conviction rates in general, but it could also be argued that anti-terrorism law protects against the most devastating possible outcomes, and therefore it may be necessary to lower the threshold slightly for how many are arrested.

12 Aug | ECHR BLOG: Less Than 1 Euro Not a Significant Disadvantage: Antoine Buyse blogs on the continuing impact of the new Protocol 14 which, amongst other things (see our post), allows the European Court of Human Rights  to declare cases inadmissible if there is a ‘lack of significant advantage’. In this case,the claimant wanted to recover 22,50 Russian Roubles (less than 1 Euro) in court fees. The Court thought this was too little and declared the case inadmissible.

Comments are open for this post.

Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS

1 comment;


  1. John Hirst says:

    Not wishing to be pedantic but your photo shows not a Hoover rather it is a vacuum cleaner made by Dyson…

Comments are closed.

Welcome to the UKHRB


This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe

Categories


Tags


Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption AI air pollution air travel ALBA Allergy Al Qaeda Amnesty International animal rights Animals anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 article 263 TFEU Artificial Intelligence Asbestos Assange assisted suicide asylum asylum seekers Australia autism badgers benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery British Waterways Board Catholic Church Catholicism Chagos Islanders Charter of Fundamental Rights child protection Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners civil partnerships climate change clinical negligence closed material procedure Coercion Commission on a Bill of Rights common law communications competition confidentiality consent conservation constitution contact order contact tracing contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus costs costs budgets Court of Protection crime criminal law Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation DEFRA deportation deprivation of liberty derogations Detention Dignitas diplomacy disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Equality Act 2010 Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Convention on Human Rights European Court of Human Rights European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Facebook Family Fatal Accidents Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office foreign policy France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage gay rights Gaza Gender genetics Germany Google Grenfell Gun Control Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Human Rights Watch Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests insurance international law internet inuit Iran Iraq Ireland islam Israel Italy IVF ivory ban Japan joint enterprise judaism judicial review Judicial Review reform Julian Assange jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid legal aid cuts Leveson Inquiry lgbtq liability Libel Liberty Libya lisbon treaty Lithuania local authorities marriage Media and Censorship mental capacity Mental Capacity Act Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery morocco murder music Muslim nationality national security naturism neuroscience NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges Obituary parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury physician assisted death Piracy Plagiarism planning planning system Poland Police Politics Pope press prison Prisoners prisoner votes Prisons privacy Professional Discipline Property proportionality Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries quarantine Radicalisation rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania Round Up Royals Russia saudi arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice Secret trials sexual offence Sikhism Smoking social media social workers South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing starvation statelessness stem cells stop and search Strasbourg super injunctions Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture travel treason treaty accession trial by jury TTIP Turkey Twitter UK Ukraine universal credit universal jurisdiction unlawful detention USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wildlife wind farms WomenInLaw Worboys wrongful birth YearInReview Zimbabwe

Disclaimer


This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.

%d bloggers like this: