• Home
  • Subscribe
  • Case table
  • About
  • Topics
    • Legal topics
      • Children
      • Criminal
      • Employment
      • Environment
      • European
      • Freedom of Information
      • Immigration/Extradition
      • Inquests and Inquiries
      • Family
      • International
      • Media
      • Medical
      • Mental Health
      • Politics / Public Order
      • Prisons
      • Religion
      • Terrorism
    • Introduction to Human Rights
    • Article 2
    • Article 3
    • Article 4
    • Article 5
    • Article 6
    • Article 7
    • Article 8
    • Article 9
    • Article 10
    • Article 11
    • Article 12
    • Article 13
    • Article 14
    • Protocol 1 Article 1
    • Protocol 1 Article 3
    • Protocol 2 Article 1
  • Archive
  • Contact

UK Human Rights Blog

Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Article 5

Article 5 | Right to liberty and security of the person

Read posts on this Article


Art.5 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides as follows:

(1) Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law:

(a) the lawful detention of a person after conviction by a competent court
(b) the lawful arrest or detention of a person for non-compliance with the lawful order of a court or in order to secure the fulfillment of any obligation prescribed by law
(c) the lawful arrest or detention of a person effected for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence or when it is reasonably considered necessary to prevent his committing an offence or fleeing after having done so
(d) the detention of a minor by lawful order for the purpose of educational supervision or his lawful detention for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority
(e) the lawful detention of persons for the prevention of the spreading of infectious diseases, of persons of unsound mind, alcoholics or drug addicts or vagrants
(f) the lawful arrest or detention of a person to prevent his effecting an unauthorised entry into the country or of a person against whom action is being taken with a view to deportation or extradition.

(2) Everyone who is arrested shall be informed promptly, in a language which he understands, of the reasons for his arrest and of any charge against him.

(3) Everyone arrested or detained in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1(c) of this Article shall be brought promptly before a judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power and shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial. Release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial.

(4) Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided speedily by a court and his release ordered if the detention is not lawful.

(5) Everyone who has been the victim of arrest or detention in contravention of the provisions of this Article shall have an enforceable right to compensation.

The first part of Art.5 governs all situations where people are deprived of their physical liberty; this can extend from detention for less that two hours for the purpose of deportation (X & Y v Sweden Application No.00007376/76) to the holding of a patient in an open ward of a mental hospital (Ashingdane v United Kingdom (1985) 7 EHRR 528), as well as the more obvious situations involving arrest for criminal offences.

The reference to the “liberty and security of the person” means simply that the arrest must not be arbitrary; individuals should be “secure” from the unexplained and unlawful actions of the State: Bozano v France (1986) 9 EHRR 297.

The right to liberty cannot be absolute and the rest of the Article is dedicated to an exhaustive list of conditions under which a person’s liberty can lawfully be curtailed. Each of these permissible forms of detention depends for its legitimacy on the availability of review. In other words, there must be periodic scrutiny of the legality of the detention by an independent court or tribunal

  • Return to Incorporated Rights Index
  • Introduction to the Human Rights Act 1998

Share:

  • Email
  • Digg

Leave a Comment »

  • Welcome!

    UK Human Rights Blog is written by members of 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscription is free.

    Editorial Team

    • Adam Wagner
    • Rosalind English
    • Angus McCullough QC

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 9,753 other followers

  • Browse by legal topic

  • RSS Recommended

    • Murder, Terrorism - two important cases February 23, 2012
    • High Court upholds University Fees Regulations February 23, 2012
    • The Mayor Commonalty and Citizens of London v Samede (St Paul's Churchyard camp representative) & Ors (Rev 1) [2012] EWCA Civ 160 (22 February 2012) February 22, 2012
      Court of Appeal refuses permission for Occupy London to appeal High Court eviction ruling
    • Gove urged to clarify position on anti-gay texts in schools - PinkNews.co.uk February 22, 2012
    • BBC - Law in Action, Legal aid changes: long overdue reform or denial of justice? February 22, 2012
    • KENNEDY V IC AND CHARITY COMMISSION: COURT OF APPEAL DECIDES February 22, 2012
    • Legal Blogging, by former UKHRB contributor Melina Padron February 21, 2012
    • Kate Malleson: Taking the politics out of judicial appointments? February 21, 2012
  • RSS Case law

    • The Mayor Commonalty and Citizens of London v Samede (St Paul's Churchyard camp representative) & Ors (Rev 1) [2012] EWCA Civ 160 (22 February 2012) February 22, 2012
      Court of Appeal refuses permission for Occupy London to appeal High Court eviction ruling
    • Hurley & Moore, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation & Skills [2012] EWHC 201 (Admin) (17 February 2012) February 17, 2012
      2 students fail in judicial review of tuition fee rises. Human rights (right to education under A2/P2) challenge failed outright; public law challenge failed despite finding that Sec of State "did not carry out the rigorous attention to" Public Sector Equality Duties
    • Sugar v British Broadcasting Corporation & Anor [2012] UKSC 4 (15 February 2012) February 15, 2012
      Supreme Court: BBC need not disclsoe Israel-Palestine coverage bias report as it falls under the "journalistic material" exemption to the Freedom of Information Act
    • HARDY AND MAILE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 31965/07 [2012] ECHR 261 (14 February 2012) February 14, 2012
      Strasbourg Art 8 challenge to construction of liquefied natural gas terminals in Milford Haven harbour fails
    • Milind Manohar Sanade, Damion Harrison and Conroy Maurice Walker -v- The Secretary of State for The Home Department - Upper Tribunal February 10, 2012
      Upper Tribunal guidelines decision on human rights exceptions to automatic deportations of immigrants with spouse and young children
    • T, R (on the application of) v Greater Manchester Police & Anor [2012] EWHC 147 (Admin) (09 February 2012) February 9, 2012
      Student fails in human rights challenge to Enhanced Criminal Records Certificate with warning incurred when he was 11 for theft of 2 bicycles
  • Wikio - Top Blogs - Law
  • UKHRB on Twitter

    • New post > Poor not singled out by rise in university fees, rules court http://t.co/BpK09xDL 8 hours ago
    • RT @For_the_defence: Thanks to @Oxfordbarsoc for a great evening at their Human Rights panel question time, great to meet @AdamWagner1 too. 9 hours ago
    • Had a really fun evening at @oxfordbarsoc's human rights question time. Most of the clashes were over death penalty (P Hitchins v @amicus) 18 hours ago
    • Aw shucks thanks everyone! 18 hours ago
    • (-: http://t.co/cUZnLoQL 22 hours ago
    • On train to Oxford for #hrqt (Human Rights Question Time) organised by @oxfordbarsoc. Anyone else coming / tweeting? 23 hours ago
    • RT @JackofKent: Civil disobedience and the Rule of Law, my new post at @NewStatesman: http://t.co/cq4cb9Kc 1 day ago
    Follow @adamwagner1
  • RSS Recent posts

    • Poor not singled out by rise in university fees, rules court February 22, 2012 Karwan Eskerie
    • Crimes committed by victims of human trafficking – should they be prosecuted? February 22, 2012 Rosalind English
    • Michael Gove’s full letter on homophobic teaching materials in schools February 22, 2012 Adam Wagner
    • Keeping it controversial: Religion, deportation and open justice – The Human Rights Roundup February 20, 2012 Wessen Jazrawi
    • Belgium bitten by Aarhus – again February 19, 2012 David Hart QC
    • Is it legal to teach gay hate in schools? February 19, 2012 Adam Wagner
    • Analysis | Court of Appeal upholds hotel gay discrimination ruling – Marina Wheeler February 19, 2012 1 Crown Office Row
    • Former Top Judge hits back at current Top Judge February 17, 2012 Richard Mumford
  • Links

    • 1 Crown Office Row
    • 1COR Human Rights Update
    • 1COR resources
    • A(nother) Lawyer Writes
    • Ashley Connick's Blog
    • AVMA Blog
    • BAILII
    • Beneath the Wig
    • British Institute of Human Rights
    • Cearta.ie
    • Charon QC
    • David Allen Green
    • ECHR Blog
    • ECHR News
    • Education Law Blog
    • EJIL Talk!
    • eutopia Law
    • Family Lore
    • Free Movement Blog
    • Garrulous Law
    • Guardian Legal Network
    • Halsbury's Law Exchange
    • Head of Legal
    • Human Rights in Ireland
    • Inforrm's Blog
    • Inner Temple Current Awareness
    • Jack of Kent
    • Jailhouse Lawyer's Blog
    • Joint Council for Welfare of Immigrants
    • Joshua Rozenberg's Blog
    • Law and Lawyers
    • Law Think
    • Lawbore
    • Lawyer Watch
    • Legal Week Legal Village
    • Meeja Law
    • Mental Health Law Online
    • Nearly Legal
    • Panopticon Blog
    • PHD Studies in Human Rights
    • Pink Tape
    • RightsNI
    • RPC Privacy Blog
    • Strasbourg Observers
    • The Human Rights Blog
    • The Justice Gap
    • The Magistrate's Blog
    • The Pupillage Blog
    • The Small Places
    • The Time Blawg
    • UK Constitutional Law Group blog
    • UK Freedom of Information Blog
    • UK Immigration Law Blog
    • UK Supreme Court Blog
    • Venables legal resources
    • Watching the Law
  • Disclaimer

    This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Blog at WordPress.com. Fonts on this blog.

Theme: MistyLook by Sadish.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.