Release of Shaker Aamer, but UK authorities face difficult questions – the Round-up

2 November 2015 by

In the news

Following almost fourteen years of detention without trial, the last British resident to be held in Guantanamo Bay, Shaker Aamer, has been released. Amnesty International has described Aamer’s plight as “one of the worst of all the detainees at Guantanamo,” given the time involved, the lengthy spells in solitary confinement and the torture he was allegedly subjected to.

“The case against the US authorities that perpetrated this travesty of justice, and British ministers and security personnel who allegedly colluded with them, should now be vigorously pursued”, writes the Observer. Long-standing questions remain surrounding claims of UK complicity in human rights abuses: in the 2009 civil case of former Guantanamo detainee Binyam Mohamed, the High Court pointedly noted that the UK’s relationship with US authorities went “far beyond that of a bystander or witness to the alleged wrongdoing.”

An investigation by the Metropolitan Police into the extent of British involvement is already under way. However, as UK HRB’s Jim Duffy argues, “anything less than a judge-led inquiry would seem ill-equipped to press the UK’s security apparatus in the way that ensures Aamer’s allegations of torture, complicity and unlawful imprisonment are properly ventilated.”

For the present, Shaker Aamer is quietly adjusting to life with his wife and children, including a fourteen year-old son he has never met. With Aamer having been cleared for release in 2007, the reunion is long overdue.

In other news:

  • BBC: Lord Harris has warned that young people “will continue to die unnecessarily” in our prisons, unless measures are taken to combat unsafe environments caused by overcrowding, escalating violence and fewer staff and resources. The peer expressed “frustration” at the lack of government response to his report on self-inflicted deaths, submitted to the Ministry of Justice six months ago.
  • The Telegraph: the Government is facing legal action from a human rights group, following amendment of the ministerial code so as to remove a requirement that ministers comply with international law. Director of Rights Watch UK, Yasmine Ahmed, has described changes to the code as “seriously concerning”, reflecting a “market shift in the attitude and commitment of the UK Government towards its international legal obligations.” David Allen Green considers the significance of the amendment in the Financial Times.
  • The Independent: the family of Mark Duggan has been granted permission to appeal a ruling of the High Court that an inquest jury were entitled to find he was ‘lawfully killed’ by a police marksman. In granting permission, Lord Justice Sales noted that “the shooting dead of a suspect by the police is always a matter for careful scrutiny.”
  • An inquest report into the death of 84 year-old Alois Dvorzac has described his treatment by the Home Office as “shameful”. Mr Dvorzac was detained in Harmondsworth immigration centre for two weeks prior to his death, despite suffering from heart disease and dementia. Mr Dvorzac spent his last hours “chained to a custody officer without justification,” which according to the report may have amounted to “inhuman and degrading treatment’ in violation of Article 3 ECHR. The Guardian reports.

UK HRB posts

Hannah Lynes


If you would like your event to be mentioned on the Blog, please email the details to Jim Duffy, at

Welcome to the UKHRB

This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.




This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.


Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption ALBA Al Qaeda animal rights anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 Artificial Intelligence Asbestos assisted suicide asylum Australia autism benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery Catholicism Chagos Islanders Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners climate change clinical negligence Coercion common law confidentiality consent conservation constitution contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus costs Court of Protection crime Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation deportation deprivation of liberty Detention disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Family Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage Gaza genetics Germany Google Grenfell Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests international law internet Inuit Iran Iraq Ireland Islam Israel Italy IVF Japan Judaism judicial review jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid Leveson Inquiry LGBTQ Rights liability Libel Liberty Libya Lithuania local authorities marriage mental capacity Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery music Muslim nationality national security NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury Piracy Plagiarism planning Poland Police Politics pollution press Prisoners Prisons privacy Professional Discipline Property proportionality Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania Round Up Royals Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice sexual offence Sikhism Smoking social media South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing statelessness stop and search Strasbourg Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture travel treaty TTIP Turkey UK Ukraine USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wind farms WomenInLaw YearInReview Zimbabwe
%d bloggers like this: