• Home
  • Subscribe
  • Case table
  • About
  • Topics
    • Legal topics
      • Children
      • Criminal
      • Employment
      • Environment
      • European
      • Freedom of Information
      • Immigration/Extradition
      • Inquests and Inquiries
      • Family
      • International
      • Media
      • Medical
      • Mental Health
      • Politics / Public Order
      • Prisons
      • Religion
      • Terrorism
    • Introduction to Human Rights
    • Article 2
    • Article 3
    • Article 4
    • Article 5
    • Article 6
    • Article 7
    • Article 8
    • Article 9
    • Article 10
    • Article 11
    • Article 12
    • Article 13
    • Article 14
    • Protocol 1 Article 1
    • Protocol 1 Article 3
    • Protocol 2 Article 1
  • Archive
  • Contact

UK Human Rights Blog

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« UKIP Supreme Court judgment analysis
End of the age of terrorism for human rights campaigners [updated] »

New legislation website launched, updated to 2002

August 2, 2010 by Adam Wagner

The government has launched a sparkly looking but as yet scantily featured new legislation website, legislation.gov.uk, to replace the two websites which previously did the same job, OPSI and the Statute Law Database.

One notable absence from the National Archives-run site is any guarantee that the statutes will be up to date after 2002. This was also a limitation of its predecessors, which is why lawyers generally avoided them for fear of unknowingly using an out-of-date statute. “About half” of the legislation is now up to date, according to the frequently asked questions section. This is surprising given the amount of money which is spent on Government IT; the new website asking what laws people want scrapped will apparently alone cost £20,000.

Making the law of the land readily available to the general public is probably the most basic requirement of ensuring access to justice. This is particularly so given that many people chose to litigate their own cases these days rather than instructing costly solicitors and barristers, a trend which is likely to increase once legal aid is further reduced in the coming “brutal” reforms. It is Kafkaesque to expect people to litigate in criminal or civil proceedings without any cheap way of knowing what the up-to-date law is.

At the moment, the only way to know for sure what law is on the statute books post-2002 is to subscribe to expensive services such as Westlaw or Lexis Nexis Butterworths. Mercifully most important case-law (i.e. judgments of courts) is contained on the excellent British and Irish Legal Information Institute website, run on donations, which we always try to link to for judgments. The new Supreme Court website has also improved the situation by providing highly useful press-summaries of all of its new judgments. It is a great shame that up-to-date statute law is not similarly available and this can only be a bad thing for access to justice and ensuring the right to a fair trial.

Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS

Rate this:

Share:

  • Email
  • Digg

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Posted in Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, In the news, Judges and Juries, Politics / Public Order | Tagged Access to justice | Leave a Comment

  • Welcome!

    UK Human Rights Blog is written by members of 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscription is free.

    Editorial Team

    • Adam Wagner
    • Rosalind English
    • Angus McCullough QC

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 9,413 other followers

  • Browse by legal topic

  • RSS Recommended

    • Case Law: Axel Springer v Germany, Grand Chamber finds violation of Article 10 – Sara Mansoori February 9, 2012
    • Supreme Court decision on Rabone v Pennine Care NHS Trust - Hempsons February 9, 2012
    • T, R (on the application of) v Greater Manchester Police & Anor [2012] EWHC 147 (Admin) (09 February 2012) February 9, 2012
      Student fails in human rights challenge to Enhanced Criminal Records Certificate with warning incurred when he was 11 for theft of 2 bicycles
    • Strasbourg Rulings on Two Personal Privacy Claims February 8, 2012
    • Open Justice « 2drj February 8, 2012
    • Wigs off, jeans on at the Judicial College | Joshua Rozenberg | Law | guardian.co.uk February 8, 2012
    • Contempt laws are still valid in the internet age | Dominic Grieve February 8, 2012
    • Speeches of Bratza and Hammarberg - ECHR Blog February 8, 2012
  • RSS Case law

    • T, R (on the application of) v Greater Manchester Police & Anor [2012] EWHC 147 (Admin) (09 February 2012) February 9, 2012
      Student fails in human rights challenge to Enhanced Criminal Records Certificate with warning incurred when he was 11 for theft of 2 bicycles
    • Othman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSIAC B1 (6 February 2012) February 8, 2012
      Terrorist suspect Abu Qatada granted bail on strict conditions. However, Secretary of State must show evidence of progress in his deportation in next 3 months then deprivation of liberty will no longer be justifiable.
    • AT v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 42 (07 February 2012) February 7, 2012
      Control order of member of Libyan Islamic Fighting Group ruled unlawful as wasn't given enough information about case against him as mandated in A v UK
    • Moussaoui, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 126 (Admin) (03 February 2012) February 6, 2012
      Detention of Mentally ill foreign criminal pending deportation was unlawful as regular reviews not carried out. Given damages of £1
    • Coogan v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 48 February 1, 2012
      Investigator Glen Mulcaire loses self-incrimination appeal against order that he should reveal phone hacking clients.
    • D and S, R (on the application of) v Manchester City Council [2012] EWHC 17 (Admin) (12 January 2012) January 31, 2012
      Chalenge by 2 elderly disabled people to £17m adult social care cuts by Manchester City Council fails. Consultation and regard to equality duties adequate.
  • Wikio - Top Blogs - Law
  • UKHRB on Twitter

    • RT @daniel_barnett: Here's what I REALLY think about the Stott case - http://t.co/gCIHyevb. @AdamWagner1 also has excellent piece at htt ... 30 minutes ago
    • Congrats to @1crownofficerow's Martin Forde QC, to fill Judicial Appointments Commission vacancy left by Lord Sumption http://t.co/wu7yVWAx 1 hour ago
    • RT @INFORRM: Case Law: Axel Springer v Germany, Grand Chamber finds violation of Article 10 - Sara Mansoori http://t.co/r5pBIQU3 1 hour ago
    • ... would have found that but for case law! Mr Justice Parker inviting Court of Appeal / Supreme Court to bite the bullet here 2 hours ago
    • ... also gives permission to appeal. Wld have found scheme "provides no mechanism for review.. disproportionate.. not compatible with A8.".. 2 hours ago
    • ... police warning were for theft of 2 bicycles when 11, student now 20. High Court judge "reluctantly" finds no breach of article 8... 2 hours ago
    • Student fails in human rights challenge to Enhanced Criminal Records Certificate with warning incurred when he was 11 http://t.co/ZtTJCQKo 2 hours ago
    Follow @adamwagner1
  • RSS Recent posts

    • Abu Qatada relased on “very restrictive” bail conditions February 9, 2012 Rosalind English
    • Please stow your rights in the overhead compartment February 9, 2012 Rosalind English
    • Hospital had human rights duty to protect voluntary patient from suicide, rules Supreme Court February 8, 2012 Adam Wagner
    • Libya employee can sue for dismissal in UK February 8, 2012 Rosalind English
    • Times contempt challenge thrown out in Strasbourg February 8, 2012 Adam Wagner
    • Indefinite detention: not very British February 8, 2012 freemovement
    • UK Supreme Court is tweeting, but where are the other courts? February 7, 2012 Adam Wagner
    • Axel Springer and Von Hannover: Grand Chamber victory for media – Inforrm February 7, 2012 1 Crown Office Row
  • Links

    • 1 Crown Office Row
    • 1COR Human Rights Update
    • 1COR resources
    • A(nother) Lawyer Writes
    • Ashley Connick's Blog
    • AVMA Blog
    • BAILII
    • Beneath the Wig
    • British Institute of Human Rights
    • Cearta.ie
    • Charon QC
    • David Allen Green
    • ECHR Blog
    • ECHR News
    • Education Law Blog
    • EJIL Talk!
    • eutopia Law
    • Family Lore
    • Free Movement Blog
    • Garrulous Law
    • Guardian Legal Network
    • Halsbury's Law Exchange
    • Head of Legal
    • Human Rights in Ireland
    • Inforrm's Blog
    • Inner Temple Current Awareness
    • Jack of Kent
    • Jailhouse Lawyer's Blog
    • Joint Council for Welfare of Immigrants
    • Joshua Rozenberg's Blog
    • Law and Lawyers
    • Law Think
    • Lawbore
    • Lawyer Watch
    • Legal Week Legal Village
    • Meeja Law
    • Mental Health Law Online
    • Nearly Legal
    • Panopticon Blog
    • PHD Studies in Human Rights
    • Pink Tape
    • RightsNI
    • RPC Privacy Blog
    • Strasbourg Observers
    • The Human Rights Blog
    • The Justice Gap
    • The Magistrate's Blog
    • The Pupillage Blog
    • The Small Places
    • The Time Blawg
    • UK Constitutional Law Group blog
    • UK Freedom of Information Blog
    • UK Immigration Law Blog
    • UK Supreme Court Blog
    • Venables legal resources
    • Watching the Law
  • Disclaimer

    This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Blog at WordPress.com. Fonts on this blog.

Theme: MistyLook by Sadish.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 9,413 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.