• Home
  • Subscribe
  • Case table
  • About
  • Topics
    • Legal topics
      • Children
      • Criminal
      • Employment
      • Environment
      • European
      • Freedom of Information
      • Immigration/Extradition
      • Inquests and Inquiries
      • Family
      • International
      • Media
      • Medical
      • Mental Health
      • Politics / Public Order
      • Prisons
      • Religion
      • Terrorism
    • Introduction to Human Rights
    • Article 2
    • Article 3
    • Article 4
    • Article 5
    • Article 6
    • Article 7
    • Article 8
    • Article 9
    • Article 10
    • Article 11
    • Article 12
    • Article 13
    • Article 14
    • Protocol 1 Article 1
    • Protocol 1 Article 3
    • Protocol 2 Article 1
  • Archive
  • Contact

UK Human Rights Blog

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Control orders quashed, compensation claims may follow
Stolen documents divorce ruling a blow to human rights of poorer partners? [updated] »

UKIP can keep donation despite breach of party funding rules

July 29, 2010 by Adam Wagner

An appropriate logo

The Supreme Court has narrowly held that the UK Independence Party (UKIP) can keep nearly all of a £349,216 donation despite the donor not being a permissible donor at the time of receipt, contrary to party funding rules under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.

The Supreme Court upheld an order originally made at the City of Westminster Magistrates Court to the effect that the party only had to give back a small proportion of the money. UKIP will now only have to forfeit £14,481, rather than the full amount. According to the BBC, this will save the party from financial ruin. We will have more detail on the decision, which was by a narrow 4-3 majority, soon. In the meantime, the Supreme Court press summary can be found here, and is reproduced below.

Rate this:

Share:

  • Email
  • Digg

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Posted in Politics / Public Order, Protocol 1 Art. 1 | Peaceful enjoyment of property, Protocol 1 Art. 3 | Free elections | Tagged party funding, UKIP | Leave a Comment

  • Welcome!

    UK Human Rights Blog is written by members of 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscription is free.

    Editorial Team

    • Adam Wagner
    • Rosalind English
    • Angus McCullough QC

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 9,753 other followers

  • Browse by legal topic

  • RSS Recommended

    • Murder, Terrorism - two important cases February 23, 2012
    • High Court upholds University Fees Regulations February 23, 2012
    • The Mayor Commonalty and Citizens of London v Samede (St Paul's Churchyard camp representative) & Ors (Rev 1) [2012] EWCA Civ 160 (22 February 2012) February 22, 2012
      Court of Appeal refuses permission for Occupy London to appeal High Court eviction ruling
    • Gove urged to clarify position on anti-gay texts in schools - PinkNews.co.uk February 22, 2012
    • BBC - Law in Action, Legal aid changes: long overdue reform or denial of justice? February 22, 2012
    • KENNEDY V IC AND CHARITY COMMISSION: COURT OF APPEAL DECIDES February 22, 2012
    • Legal Blogging, by former UKHRB contributor Melina Padron February 21, 2012
    • Kate Malleson: Taking the politics out of judicial appointments? February 21, 2012
  • RSS Case law

    • The Mayor Commonalty and Citizens of London v Samede (St Paul's Churchyard camp representative) & Ors (Rev 1) [2012] EWCA Civ 160 (22 February 2012) February 22, 2012
      Court of Appeal refuses permission for Occupy London to appeal High Court eviction ruling
    • Hurley & Moore, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation & Skills [2012] EWHC 201 (Admin) (17 February 2012) February 17, 2012
      2 students fail in judicial review of tuition fee rises. Human rights (right to education under A2/P2) challenge failed outright; public law challenge failed despite finding that Sec of State "did not carry out the rigorous attention to" Public Sector Equality Duties
    • Sugar v British Broadcasting Corporation & Anor [2012] UKSC 4 (15 February 2012) February 15, 2012
      Supreme Court: BBC need not disclsoe Israel-Palestine coverage bias report as it falls under the "journalistic material" exemption to the Freedom of Information Act
    • HARDY AND MAILE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 31965/07 [2012] ECHR 261 (14 February 2012) February 14, 2012
      Strasbourg Art 8 challenge to construction of liquefied natural gas terminals in Milford Haven harbour fails
    • Milind Manohar Sanade, Damion Harrison and Conroy Maurice Walker -v- The Secretary of State for The Home Department - Upper Tribunal February 10, 2012
      Upper Tribunal guidelines decision on human rights exceptions to automatic deportations of immigrants with spouse and young children
    • T, R (on the application of) v Greater Manchester Police & Anor [2012] EWHC 147 (Admin) (09 February 2012) February 9, 2012
      Student fails in human rights challenge to Enhanced Criminal Records Certificate with warning incurred when he was 11 for theft of 2 bicycles
  • Wikio - Top Blogs - Law
  • UKHRB on Twitter

    • New post > Poor not singled out by rise in university fees, rules court http://t.co/BpK09xDL 8 hours ago
    • RT @For_the_defence: Thanks to @Oxfordbarsoc for a great evening at their Human Rights panel question time, great to meet @AdamWagner1 too. 9 hours ago
    • Had a really fun evening at @oxfordbarsoc's human rights question time. Most of the clashes were over death penalty (P Hitchins v @amicus) 18 hours ago
    • Aw shucks thanks everyone! 18 hours ago
    • (-: http://t.co/cUZnLoQL 22 hours ago
    • On train to Oxford for #hrqt (Human Rights Question Time) organised by @oxfordbarsoc. Anyone else coming / tweeting? 23 hours ago
    • RT @JackofKent: Civil disobedience and the Rule of Law, my new post at @NewStatesman: http://t.co/cq4cb9Kc 1 day ago
    Follow @adamwagner1
  • RSS Recent posts

    • Poor not singled out by rise in university fees, rules court February 22, 2012 Karwan Eskerie
    • Crimes committed by victims of human trafficking – should they be prosecuted? February 22, 2012 Rosalind English
    • Michael Gove’s full letter on homophobic teaching materials in schools February 22, 2012 Adam Wagner
    • Keeping it controversial: Religion, deportation and open justice – The Human Rights Roundup February 20, 2012 Wessen Jazrawi
    • Belgium bitten by Aarhus – again February 19, 2012 David Hart QC
    • Is it legal to teach gay hate in schools? February 19, 2012 Adam Wagner
    • Analysis | Court of Appeal upholds hotel gay discrimination ruling – Marina Wheeler February 19, 2012 1 Crown Office Row
    • Former Top Judge hits back at current Top Judge February 17, 2012 Richard Mumford
  • Links

    • 1 Crown Office Row
    • 1COR Human Rights Update
    • 1COR resources
    • A(nother) Lawyer Writes
    • Ashley Connick's Blog
    • AVMA Blog
    • BAILII
    • Beneath the Wig
    • British Institute of Human Rights
    • Cearta.ie
    • Charon QC
    • David Allen Green
    • ECHR Blog
    • ECHR News
    • Education Law Blog
    • EJIL Talk!
    • eutopia Law
    • Family Lore
    • Free Movement Blog
    • Garrulous Law
    • Guardian Legal Network
    • Halsbury's Law Exchange
    • Head of Legal
    • Human Rights in Ireland
    • Inforrm's Blog
    • Inner Temple Current Awareness
    • Jack of Kent
    • Jailhouse Lawyer's Blog
    • Joint Council for Welfare of Immigrants
    • Joshua Rozenberg's Blog
    • Law and Lawyers
    • Law Think
    • Lawbore
    • Lawyer Watch
    • Legal Week Legal Village
    • Meeja Law
    • Mental Health Law Online
    • Nearly Legal
    • Panopticon Blog
    • PHD Studies in Human Rights
    • Pink Tape
    • RightsNI
    • RPC Privacy Blog
    • Strasbourg Observers
    • The Human Rights Blog
    • The Justice Gap
    • The Magistrate's Blog
    • The Pupillage Blog
    • The Small Places
    • The Time Blawg
    • UK Constitutional Law Group blog
    • UK Freedom of Information Blog
    • UK Immigration Law Blog
    • UK Supreme Court Blog
    • Venables legal resources
    • Watching the Law
  • Disclaimer

    This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Blog at WordPress.com. Fonts on this blog.

Theme: MistyLook by Sadish.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.