• Home
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • ECHR
  • Human Rights
  • Archive
  • Contact

UK Human Rights Blog

Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Home Secretary on offensive as police admit anti-terror mistakes

June 11, 2010 by Adam Wagner

The Home Secretary has pledged to conduct an “urgent review” of police stop and search powers as it has been revealed that thousands of searches may have been conducted illegally.

Teresa May, the new Home Secretary, has gone on the offensive with a Guardian editorial blaming the previous Government and promising to fix the problem urgently. She says “It has been clear for a decade that the last government held our civil liberties cheap. They introduced the powers that have been abused 10 years ago, and then sat back as they were used more and more frequently.“ She is reportedly “incandescent” over the report.

The police will find it harder to blame the previous Government. A Home Office review has revealed that they have regularly misused powers under section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000. The controversial powers may have run foul of the Human Rights Act in any event, following the European Court of Human Rights’ January ruling that section 44 violates the right to respect for private life guaranteed Article 8 (right to privacy) European Convention on Human Rights.

The Times reports:

Fourteen police forces have unlawfully stopped and searched thousands of people on the streets under controversial counter terror power. The blunder occurred when police detained people without having permission to do so from a Home Office minister. On other occasions police continued to stop and search people for longer than they had been given authorisation under the law.

The Home Secretary has also reiterated a promise made in the Coalition agreement to conduct a “robust review” of counter-terrorism legislation. Liberty, the human rights organisation, have renewed calls for urgent reform, following their long-standing campaign which led to the successful European Court ruling earlier this year.

Will claims follow?

The Guardian predicts that thousands of compensation claims may follow, and that the claimants in the European Court received £30,000 each in compensation. This is inaccurate, as in fact £500 compensation was awarded to each claimant, although their costs bill reached tens of thousands. It seems unlikely that thousands of people who were affected will ultimately make the efforts to claim, and the Government will probably stave off such claims by changing the law.

For now, it is easy for the current Government to blame the last for such mistakes, and many will welcome an anti-terrorism law review. However, the true test for this Government will come if threats of terrorism, which are currently low, emerge again during the next five years. This will mark the true test of their commitment to “restore the rights of individuals in the face of encroaching state power”.

  • Share this:

Posted in Art. 5 | Right to Liberty, Art. 8 | Right to Privacy/Family, Police, Terrorism | Tagged human rights, Police, stop and search | Leave a Comment

  • Welcome!

    UK Human Rights Blog is written by members of 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. You can subscribe to free email alerts by filling in the box below, or follow us on RSS, Facebook or Twitter.

    Editorial Team

    • Angus McCullough QC
    • Rosalind English
    • Adam Wagner
  • Click here for the 1COR website
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Selected news sources

  • Sections

    (1) Case summaries

    (2) Case comments

    (3) In the news

    (4) Features

  • Top Posts

    • Extradition agreements review is victory for rights campaigners
    • Courts entitled to ignore European DNA and fingerprints ruling... for now
    • Pilot accused of 9/11 plot entitled to compensation
    • Environmental judicial review is "prohibitively expensive", uncertain and insufficient
    • Why the Sharon Shoesmith decision is good for access to justice (and it has nothing to do with the case)
  • Click to access our Human Rights case archive, to January 2010
  • Archives

    We have two archives:
    1. Blog Archive
    (2010 onwards)
    2. Case Summaries Archive (2000 to 2009).

  • Browse by Category

    • BLOG POSTS (272)
      • 1COR (3)
      • Blog news (25)
      • Case law (126)
        • Case comments (51)
        • Case summaries (74)
      • Features (16)
      • In the news (144)
    • CONVENTION RIGHTS (208)
      • Art. 10 | Freedom of Expression (28)
      • Art. 11 | Freedom of Association (8)
      • Art. 12 | Right to Marry / Found Family (4)
      • Art. 14 | Anti-Discrimination (21)
      • Art. 2 | Right to life (29)
      • Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment (24)
      • Art. 5 | Right to Liberty (23)
      • Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial (46)
      • Art. 7 | Retrospective Punishment (3)
      • Art. 8 | Right to Privacy/Family (63)
      • Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion (9)
      • Protocol 1 Art. 1 | Peaceful enjoyment of property (7)
      • Protocol 1 Art. 3 | Free elections (10)
      • Protocol 2 Art. 1 | Right to education (6)
    • LEGAL TOPICS (237)
      • Animals (2)
      • Children (23)
      • Company/Commercial (2)
      • Costs and Procedure (3)
      • Criminal (16)
      • Damages (4)
      • Defamation / Libel (7)
      • Disciplinary Proceedings (2)
      • Education (6)
      • Employment (10)
      • Environment (8)
      • European (17)
      • Family (15)
      • Freedom of Information (12)
      • Housing (3)
      • Immigration/Extradition (28)
      • Inquests and Inquiries (13)
      • International (8)
      • Judges and Juries (22)
      • Margin of Appreciation (9)
      • Medical (20)
      • Mental Health (10)
      • Pensions (1)
      • Personal Injury (3)
      • Police (19)
      • Politics / Public Order (59)
      • Prisons (11)
      • Public/Private (3)
      • Religion (9)
      • Social Care (7)
      • Tax (1)
      • Technology (3)
      • Terrorism (33)
  • RSS Recent case law

    • 27 Aug | Patel, R (on the application of) v Lord Chancellor (7/7 victim mother refused legal aid for inquest)
    • 6 Aug | Jisha v Sec of State for the Home Department [2010] (asylum - when is a human rights appeal a human rights appeal?)
    • 16 July | G v E & Ors [2010] (re mental capacity)
    • 16 July | Mousa & Ors v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor
    • 13 July | Clift v. UK (Re prisoner sentences, European Court of Human Rights)
  • RSS Recent case comments

    • Contraception, capacity and coercion: when does a woman lack capacity to decide whether to use contraceptive treatment? August 25, 2010
    • Catholic Care gay adoption rejection boosts equality protection August 19, 2010
    • No right to gist of case before Special Immigration Appeals Commission August 4, 2010
    • Expenses scandal four lose parliamentary privilege appeal July 30, 2010
    • Minimum standards of dignity must be upheld for asylum seekers July 29, 2010
  • RSS Recent case summaries

    • Courts entitled to ignore European DNA and fingerprints ruling… for now September 1, 2010
    • The limited human right to do business September 1, 2010
    • Widow of 7/7 bomber refused legal aid for inquest August 27, 2010
    • Germany HIV popstar conviction: what would happen in the UK? August 26, 2010
    • Value to the community can be taken into account in immigration cases August 24, 2010
  • RSS Recent news

    • Extradition agreements review is victory for rights campaigners September 3, 2010
    • Why the Sharon Shoesmith decision is good for access to justice (and it has nothing to do with the case) September 2, 2010
    • Human rights roundup: The FCO, Shoesmith, and local authorities taking over the world September 2, 2010
    • Do foreign policy and human rights mix? August 31, 2010
    • Environmental judicial review is “prohibitively expensive”, uncertain and insufficient August 31, 2010
  • RSS Recent features

    • The invention of human rights August 25, 2010
    • End of the age of terrorism for human rights campaigners [updated] August 2, 2010
    • Judicial review as to the need for a single inquiry into Iraqi torture allegations to go ahead, says High Court July 19, 2010
    • Feature | The duty to investigate deaths under human rights law: Part 2 July 15, 2010
    • Feature | The duty to investigate deaths under human rights law: Part 2 July 12, 2010
  • Latest posts by author

    • Adam Wagner
      • Extradition agreements review is victory for rights campaigners
    • Rosalind English
      • No right to gist of case before Special Immigration Appeals Commission
    • E. R. Wrigley
      • Stalking, psychosis and detention: Habeas Corpus under the Human Rights Act
    • Matthew Hill
      • Value to the community can be taken into account in immigration cases
    • 1 Crown Office Row
      • New ways of sharing on the UK Human Rights Blog
    • Angus McCullough QC
      • Human rights on the battlefield – a postscript on ‘dicta’ (and ‘dicta’)
    • Philip Havers QC
      • Introduction by Philip Havers QC
    • Kate Beattie
      • Prisoners in psychiatric hospitals not entitled to equal benefits with other patients
    • Isabel McArdle
      • The limited human right to do business
    • Kate Beattie
      • New anti-bribery measures become law
    • Rachel Marcus
      • Detention of mentally ill man was illegal
    • Caroline Cross
      • Contraception, capacity and coercion: when does a woman lack capacity to decide whether to use contraceptive treatment?
    • Matt Donmall
      • Can political asylum seekers be expected to hide their political opinions?
    • David Hart QC
      • Environmental judicial review is “prohibitively expensive”, uncertain and insufficient
  • Blog Archive

  • UKHRB on Twitter

    • Representing yourself in court may save money – but will probably lead to disaster - Guardian http://icio.us/1utcfm 4 hours ago
    • Should corporations be bound by human rights treaties? - The Law Gazette http://icio.us/bpmlhx 2 days ago
    • Extradition agreements review is victory for rights campaigners: http://wp.me/pJiO3-13e 2 days ago
  • Links

    • 1 Crown Office Row
    • 1COR Human Rights Update
    • 1COR resources
    • 50 Best Human Rights Blogs (onlinedegrees.net)
    • BAILII
    • British Institute of Human Rights
    • ECHR Blog
    • Human Rights in Ireland
    • Inforrm
    • Inner Temple Blog
    • International War Crimes Report
    • Jailhouse Lawyer's Blog
    • Joshua Rozenberg's Blog
    • Lawbore
    • Strasbourg Observers
    • The Human Rights Blog
    • UK Supreme Court Blog
    • Venables legal resources
  • Top Rated

  • Disclaimer

    This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: Mistylook by Sadish.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.