Maggots, sewage, bats, butterflies and Brexit

24 March 2017 by

Leigh Day and the Human Rights Lawyers Association  hosted a full house on Wednesday 22 March when Claire McGregor and David Hart QC from 1 Crown Office Row joined Sarah Sackman from Francis Taylor Building, Adrienne Copithorne from Richard Buxton LLP and Rebekah Read from Leigh Day to speak about how to become an environmental lawyer.

The audience heard how on her first day working in environmental law, Claire McGregor boarded a plane to the Ivory Coast to work on the Trafigura case involving 30,000 claimants suing oil multinational Trafigura for compensation following a toxic oil spill. The case went on to become the largest group litigation case in the UK. More recently she has been involved in group litigation concerning odours from an animal by-products rendering plant. There has been animal processing on site for more than 100 years, with early uses involving maggot breeding; before the First World War, it was thought that the fumes of the maggotorium cured common ailments.  Today it converts animal carcass into useful proteins.

Adrienne Copithorne was drawn to environmental law as an ideal combination of public law and land law. She described cases as diverse as judicially reviewing planning permissions in order to prevent cockle harvest decline, challenging London park closures for ticketed music festivals, and acting for the owners of a large country estate affected by noise from RAF Harrier jets.

For Sarah Sackman, the bread and butter of environmental law practice was less about being Erin Brockovich and more likely to involve sewage, bats and butterflies. To be effective you need to consider regulatory, EU, public and criminal law, and to be able to use them creatively. Describing environmental law as engaging socio-economic collective rights more often than human rights, its importance lies in ensuring that decisions affecting the environment include public participation and consideration of sound evidence.

Rebekah Read spoke about her experience working on the Shell Niger Delta case, which involved claims brought in the UK on behalf of two Nigerian communities who suffered following large scale oil spills from the energy company’s pipelines in the Niger Delta. The case settled in 2015 for £55 million damages.

David Hart QC cited site visits as one of the many perks of being an environmental lawyer – including his experience staring into an electrostatic precipitator in a disused power station, and more recently inspecting shingly beaches and being treated to a fully-foraged meal afterwards. He is currently working on claims for damages for the loss of property values caused by Japanese knotweed.

A lively question and answer followed. Discussing the likely effect of Brexit and the Great Repeal Bill on environmental law, Sarah Sackman suggested that the real risk would be the political temptation to cut “green” tape in order to fast track infrastructure projects in pursuit of economic growth, at the cost of environmental protections. David Hart thought that although the system of EU-inspired environmental impact assessment would survive, the EU’s strict habitat protection laws may be vulnerable to attack from pro-business political interests.

For those keen to practice in the area, many of the speakers underlined the need to have an intellectual curiosity for the science underpinning a particular environmental law case, a willingness to engage with complex legal issues and a desire to work for a wide variety of clients. The panel encouraged anyone interested in a career in the area to sign up to the UK Environmental Law Association, and the Environmental Law Foundation.

The last word went to environmental law expert Richard Buxton, who suggested that beauty could be found in small cases and cautioned against proceeding through your career with too specific a set of objectives in mind.

For more information about the environmental law work that 1 Crown Office Row does, click here. For details about upcoming HRLA events and details of how to join click here.

1 comment;

  1. Bernard Wood says:


    Sent from my iPhone


Welcome to the UKHRB

This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.




This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.


Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption ALBA Al Qaeda animal rights anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 Artificial Intelligence Asbestos assisted suicide asylum Australia autism benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery Catholicism Chagos Islanders Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners climate change clinical negligence Coercion common law confidentiality consent conservation constitution contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus Coroners costs Court of Protection crime Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation deportation deprivation of liberty Detention disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Family Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage Gaza genetics Germany Google Grenfell Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests international law internet Inuit Iran Iraq Ireland Islam Israel Italy IVF Japan Judaism judicial review jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid Leveson Inquiry LGBTQ Rights liability Libel Liberty Libya Lithuania local authorities marriage mental capacity Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery music Muslim nationality national security NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury Piracy Plagiarism planning Poland Police Politics pollution press Prisoners Prisons privacy Professional Discipline Property proportionality Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania Round Up Royals Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice sexual offence Sikhism Smoking social media South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing statelessness stop and search Strasbourg Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture travel treaty TTIP Turkey UK Ukraine USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wind farms WomenInLaw YearInReview Zimbabwe
%d bloggers like this: