From England (to Northern Ireland) with love

8 November 2015 by

northern-ireland-flagThe High Court in Belfast will sit on Monday 9 and 10th November to hear a challenge by a same sex couple now living in Northern Ireland who seek recognition of their English marriage. The current legal dispensation in the Province is that an English same sex marriage is recognised as a civil partnership in Northern Ireland.

The Petition is resisted by the Attorney General and government of Northern Ireland and the (UK) Government Equalities Office (which reports to Nicky Morgan, the Minister for Women and Equalities). It is anticipated that Judgment will be reserved.

The case opens only a week after the Northern Ireland Assembly voted for the first time in favour of legislating for same sex marriage in the six counties. However, the vote was the subject of a petition of concern and it therefore failed as it failed to attract sufficient Unionist support. Opinion polls in the North of Ireland show support running as high as 68% in support of the introduction of same sex marriage.

This month will also see the coming into force of the Marriage Act 2015 in the Republic of Ireland after the referendum approved an amendment to the constitution allowing same sex marriage in the South in May 2015. One of the provisions of the Act will end the recognition of civil partnerships from overseas – thereby raising the stakes for same sex couples in the North.

In the case of Re X (the names are the subject of an Anonymity Order), the petitioners want their marriage recognised as such in the North of Ireland.

The problem has its origin in the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013. Marriage is a devolved matter in the Northern Ireland.

The Stormont Assembly passed a Legislative Consent Motion permitting the parliament at Westminster to legislate for Same Sex marriages entered into in England and Wales to be recognised as civil partners in Northern Ireland. This was done in Sch 2, Para 2 of the Act.

On the face of it Parliament at Westminster passed legislation which deliberately sought to ensure that a particular category of marriages entered into in England and Wales (those between same sex couples) were to be the subject of special treatment (i.e. non-recognition). In contrast to the historic situation in Wilkinson v Kitzinger this would appear to be an interference with family life.

Disentangling the justification for the Schedule and the LCM is not straightforward. At the relevant time a majority of the Northern Ireland Assembly did not support same sex marriage and the government at Westminster is likely to argue that by legislating as they did they were seeking to respect the devolved settlement in Northern Ireland (Civil Partnerships had been imposed in Northern Ireland in a period of direct rule) and they may feel that the regime they put in place avoided the possibility of same sex marriages being treated as void in the North of Ireland.

On 3 and 4th December 2015, the High Court in Belfast will hear a further challenge – this time to the refusal to allow same sex marriages to be registered in the North of Ireland.

Devolution is also likely to lead to further difficulties in the future. The Marriage and Civil Partnership (Scotland) Act 2014 makes no provision for the recognition of Scottish same sex marriages in Northern Ireland (and the Scottish Parliament would not have the authority to do so). If a same sex couple were to marry in Scotland and seek recognition of their marriage in Northern Ireland, this may well present a further serious challenge to legal order in the Province.

Martin Downs is a barrister at 1 Crown Office Row and the author of Same Sex Marriage and Civil Partnerships: The New Law (Jordan, 2014)

Related posts:



Welcome to the UKHRB

This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.




Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption AI air pollution air travel ALBA Allergy Al Qaeda Amnesty International animal rights Animals Anne Sacoolas anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 article 263 TFEU Artificial Intelligence Asbestos Assange assisted suicide asylum asylum seekers Australia autism badgers benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery British Waterways Board care homes Catholic Church Catholicism Chagos Islanders Charter of Fundamental Rights child protection Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners civil partnerships climate change clinical negligence closed material procedure Coercion Commission on a Bill of Rights common law communications competition confidentiality consent conservation constitution contact order contact tracing contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus costs costs budgets Court of Protection crime criminal law Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation DEFRA deportation deprivation of liberty derogations Detention Dignitas diplomacy diplomatic relations disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Equality Act 2010 Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Convention on Human Rights European Court of Human Rights European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Facebook Facial Recognition Family Fatal Accidents Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office foreign policy France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage gay rights Gaza Gender genetics Germany Google Grenfell Gun Control hague convention Harry Dunn Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Human Rights Watch Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests insurance international law internet inuit Iran Iraq Ireland islam Israel Italy IVF ivory ban Japan joint enterprise judaism judicial review Judicial Review reform Julian Assange jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid legal aid cuts Leveson Inquiry lgbtq liability Libel Liberty Libya lisbon treaty Lithuania local authorities marriage Media and Censorship mental capacity Mental Capacity Act Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery morocco murder music Muslim nationality national security naturism neuroscience NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges nuisance Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury physician assisted death Piracy Plagiarism planning planning system Poland Police Politics Pope press prison Prisoners prisoner votes Prisons privacy procurement Professional Discipline Property proportionality prosecutions prostituton Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries quarantine Radicalisation refugee rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania round-up Round Up Royals Russia saudi arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice Secret trials sexual offence shamima begum Sikhism Smoking social media social workers South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing starvation statelessness stem cells stop and search Strasbourg super injunctions Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance sweatshops Syria Tax technology Terrorism The Round Up tort Torture travel treason treaty accession trial by jury TTIP Turkey Twitter UK Ukraine universal credit universal jurisdiction unlawful detention USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Weekly Round-up Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wildlife wind farms WomenInLaw Worboys wrongful birth YearInReview Zimbabwe


This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.

%d bloggers like this: