Round-up: Obama in Africa, and Supreme Court on solitary confinement

3 August 2015 by

2015-07-africa-kenya-kenyatta-obamaIn the news:

President Obama made a historic trip to Kenya this week, and called upon African states to abandon anti-gay discrimination (watch the full speech here). In a speech welcomed by Human Rights Campaign, he urged Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta to stop treating people differently based on their sexuality, comparing the effects of this to racial segregation in early 20th century America.

In a separate speech, he stated that there is “no excuse” for treating women as second-class citizens, and called for an end to female genital mutilation (FGM) and child marriage.

President Kenyatta rebuffed the idea of legalising homosexuality in Kenya, stating “there are some things that we must admit we don’t share” and claimed gay rights are a “non-issue” in the minds of most Kenyans (a viewpoint supported by other leading Kenyan politicians).

Obama has also been criticised for visiting Ethiopia on the same trip – becoming the first sitting US President to do so. Ethiopia has a history of human rights abuses and a high corruption index (the ruling party won 100% of seats in a recent election), and Human Rights Watch argued that Obama’s visit would give the government a legitimacy which it “does not deserve”. Obama used the trip to encourage Ethiopia to ease their restrictions on free speech, among other issues.

Other news:

  • Nonhuman Rights Project: A New York judge has denied an attempt to have legal personhood recognised in chimpanzees, although admitting she thought that one day this might happen. NhRP argued that chimpanzees, as highly intelligent, autonomous animals, have a right not to be imprisoned against their will. Judge Jaffe was sympathetic to this argument (read the judgement here), but was ultimately bound by precedent. However, NhRP are appealing and claim a partial victory: Steven Wise, the lead attorney, argues the judgement shows “you don’t have to be a human being to be a ‘person’”.
  • “As many as 20” experienced magistrates have resigned in protest over a reform whereby convicted offenders have to pay punitive charges of up to £1,200. The reform, introduced by the last chancellor Chris Grayling, was intended to help cover the costs of the criminal justice system by encouraging an early guilty plea; however it has been label “a farce”, as courts are imposing fines that they know will never be collected, as well as putting pressure on innocent people to plead guilty.
  • Albie Sachs, a respected South African judge and anti-apartheid activist, has warned Britain against leaving the ECHR, citing a possible “domino effect”, for example encouraging South Africa to withdraw from the International Criminal Court.
  • A United Nations report has suggested that Britain should ban parents from smacking their children; Education Secretary Nicky Morgan responded saying this is an area where “we don’t want to criminalise parents”.
  • Human Rights Watch has demanded Turkmenistan to immediately release a journalist who has been “secretly detained for weeks”.
  • The Court of Appeal has agreed that Detained Fast Track appeals are inherently unfair.

In the courts:

The two appellants are prisoners who had been kept in solitary confinement for unbroken periods of several months, despite the lawful maximum being 14 days at a time, and only if authorised by the Secretary of State. The Supreme Court unanimously concluded that these confinements had been conducted unlawfully, and that the system is procedurally unfair:

“The imposition of prolonged periods of solitary confinement on the basis of what are, in substance, secret and unchallengeable allegations is, or should be, unacceptable.” [Lord Reed]

Publiclawforeveryone calls this judgement a “progressive step” and has an in-depth analysis of the Carltona Doctrine (can a prison warden exercise some of the powers of a Secretary of State?). The case is also analysed by Frances Cook, Chief Executive of the Howard League for Penal Reform.

by Alex Wessely

Events:

  • Justice Human Rights Conference, 12th October 2015 – see here for the full programme and application details.

UKHRB posts

If you would like your event to be mentioned on the Blog, please email the details to Jim Duffy, at jim.duffy@1cor.com.

1 comment;


  1. daveyone1 says:

    Reblogged this on World4Justice : NOW! Lobby Forum..

Comments are closed.

Welcome to the UKHRB


This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe

Categories


Tags


Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption AI air pollution air travel ALBA Allergy Al Qaeda Amnesty International animal rights Animals anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 article 263 TFEU Artificial Intelligence Asbestos Assange assisted suicide asylum asylum seekers Australia autism badgers benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery British Waterways Board care homes Catholic Church Catholicism Chagos Islanders Charter of Fundamental Rights child protection Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners civil partnerships climate change clinical negligence closed material procedure Coercion Commission on a Bill of Rights common law communications competition confidentiality consent conservation constitution contact order contact tracing contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus coronavirus act 2020 costs costs budgets Court of Protection covid crime criminal law Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation DEFRA deportation deprivation of liberty derogations Detention Dignitas diplomacy disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Equality Act 2010 Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Convention on Human Rights European Court of Human Rights European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Facebook Facial Recognition Family Fatal Accidents Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office foreign policy France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage gay rights Gaza Gender genetics Germany Google Grenfell Gun Control Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Human Rights Watch Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests insurance international law internet inuit Iran Iraq Ireland islam Israel Italy IVF ivory ban Japan joint enterprise judaism judicial review Judicial Review reform Julian Assange jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid legal aid cuts Leveson Inquiry lgbtq liability Libel Liberty Libya lisbon treaty Lithuania local authorities marriage Media and Censorship mental capacity Mental Capacity Act Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery morocco murder music Muslim nationality national security naturism neuroscience NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges nuisance Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury physician assisted death Piracy Plagiarism planning planning system Poland Police Politics Pope press prison Prisoners prisoner votes Prisons privacy Professional Discipline Property proportionality prosecutions Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries quarantine Radicalisation rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania round-up Round Up Royals Russia saudi arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice Secret trials sexual offence shamima begum Sikhism Smoking social media social workers South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing starvation statelessness stem cells stop and search Strasbourg super injunctions Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance sweatshops Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture travel treason treaty accession trial by jury TTIP Turkey Twitter UK Ukraine universal credit universal jurisdiction unlawful detention USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wildlife wind farms WomenInLaw Worboys wrongful birth YearInReview Zimbabwe

Disclaimer


This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.

%d bloggers like this: