The Law in These Parts – this Sunday, 2:30pm

6 November 2012 by

A quick note to say that the UK Jewish Film Festival is showing a fascinating new Israeli documentary (with subtitles), The Law in These Parts, this Sunday at 2:30pm at the Tricycle Cinema in Kilburn. The film will be followed by a discussion, chaired by me, between Danny Friedman of Matrix chambers and Jonathan Turner of 13 Old Square chambers. All details are here.

I have seen the film and it is excellent. It is an examination of legal proceedings in the territories occupied by Israel since 1967. The documentary is made up almost entirely of interviews with former judges in Israel’s security courts, including a Supreme Court justice, which in itself of great interest. Although the legal and moral issues faced up to in the film are in one way unique to Israel, many from the UK legal community will recognise themes in relation to Northern Ireland during the Troubles, as well as broader problems which we are still grappling with involving the use of secret evidence and evidence obtained by torture.

In short, one of the best legal documentaries I have seen, and highly recommended (not just by me – Newsweek described it as “a gripping new documentary“). I hope to see you there, do come and say hello if you can make it. Book here – trailer below

Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS


  1. Laila Namdarkhan says:

    Oh! Remind me did Uk occupy N. Ireland I thought it was part of UK?
    Is this documentary a justification for Israels illegal occupation of Palestine. The Internstional Law says what it does is illegal even though Israel says they are not an occupying force but dealing with issues over disputed lands. Perhaps as lawyers you can tell me who is right???

  2. Raymond Ocampo says:

    What could ever induce you to urge such a film for the countries surrounding Israel and calling for her destruction? Answer: nothing. You’re as afraid of Muslims as your parents and grandparents were of Hitler before WW2. Human rights count only when Israel is on the stand–not when the surrounding tyrannies and jihadists are concerned. But … congratulations!
    Your dear parents and grandparents, could they see you now, would be proud of their continued strain of cowardice and hypocrisy. Churchill knew and wrote about it … but you have ignored him and the lessons presumably obvious to anyone–but anyone– in the course and aftermath of WW2. Keep telling democracies how unworthy they are, and keep encouraging the despots who are immune from your gaze, let alone understanding.

  3. goggzilla says:


  4. olga says:

    For those of us that will not have the chance to attend ,is there any other way that we can watch this documentary?Because I find it very interesting!Thank you

  5. Avellana says:

    Any chance of this coming to Inverness? Eden Court Theatre? We need some lessons learned in the face of potential division, ugly Nationalism and border control.

  6. James Lawson says:

    An interesting analysis of how years of terrorism can undermine and destroy the very fabric of a country’s legal system. Chapter 8 of the documentary is available on ‘U’Tube:

    1. Laila Namdarkhan says:

      So tell me who are the terrorists you are referring to? From what I understand Israel was founded by terrorists the stern gang et al. You need to be careful on the use of such language when it comes to Israeli treatment of Palestonians the human rights laws are broken every minute of the day. I have witnessed at first hand how the Israeli occupation forces behave .

Welcome to the UKHRB

This blog is run by 1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers. Subscribe for free updates here. The blog's editorial team is:
Commissioning Editor: Jonathan Metzer
Editorial Team: Rosalind English
Angus McCullough QC David Hart QC
Martin Downs
Jim Duffy

Free email updates

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog for free and receive weekly notifications of new posts by email.




This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.

Our privacy policy can be found on our ‘subscribe’ page or by clicking here.


Aarhus Abortion Abu Qatada Abuse Access to justice adoption ALBA Al Qaeda animal rights anonymity Article 1 Protocol 1 Article 2 article 3 Article 4 article 5 Article 6 Article 8 Article 9 article 10 Article 11 article 13 Article 14 Artificial Intelligence Asbestos assisted suicide asylum Australia autism benefits Bill of Rights biotechnology blogging Bloody Sunday brexit Bribery Catholicism Chagos Islanders Children children's rights China christianity citizenship civil liberties campaigners climate change clinical negligence Coercion common law confidentiality consent conservation constitution contempt of court Control orders Copyright coronavirus costs Court of Protection crime Cybersecurity Damages data protection death penalty defamation deportation deprivation of liberty Detention disability disclosure Discrimination disease divorce DNA domestic violence duty of care ECHR ECtHR Education election Employment Environment Equality Act Ethiopia EU EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU costs EU law European Court of Justice evidence extradition extraordinary rendition Family Fertility FGM Finance foreign criminals foreign office France freedom of assembly Freedom of Expression freedom of information freedom of speech Gay marriage Gaza genetics Germany Google Grenfell Health HIV home office Housing HRLA human rights Human Rights Act human rights news Huntington's Disease immigration India Indonesia injunction Inquests international law internet Inuit Iran Iraq Ireland Islam Israel Italy IVF Japan Judaism judicial review jury trial JUSTICE Justice and Security Bill Law Pod UK legal aid Leveson Inquiry LGBTQ Rights liability Libel Liberty Libya Lithuania local authorities marriage mental capacity Mental Health military Ministry of Justice modern slavery music Muslim nationality national security NHS Northern Ireland nuclear challenges Obituary ouster clauses parental rights parliamentary expenses scandal patents Pensions Personal Injury Piracy Plagiarism planning Poland Police Politics pollution press Prisoners Prisons privacy Professional Discipline Property proportionality Protection of Freedoms Bill Protest Public/Private public access public authorities public inquiries rehabilitation Reith Lectures Religion RightsInfo right to die right to family life Right to Privacy right to swim riots Roma Romania Round Up Royals Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland secrecy secret justice sexual offence Sikhism Smoking social media South Africa Spain special advocates Sports Standing statelessness stop and search Strasbourg Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada surrogacy surveillance Syria Tax technology Terrorism tort Torture travel treaty TTIP Turkey UK Ukraine USA US Supreme Court vicarious liability Wales War Crimes Wars Welfare Western Sahara Whistleblowing Wikileaks wind farms WomenInLaw YearInReview Zimbabwe
%d bloggers like this: