Philip Havers QC of 1 Crown Office Row is representing Martin in the judicial review proceedings. He is not the author of this post. Albert Camus famously wrote: ‘there is but one truly serious philosophical problem and that is suicide.’ However profound a philosophical problem, the question of suicide or, more precisely, assisted suicide is proving quite [...]
Archive for the ‘Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion’ Category
Are lawyers in right-to-die cases breaking the law?
Posted in Art. 2 | Right to life, Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion, Case summaries, Criminal, Disciplinary Proceedings, Medical, tagged assisting suicide, suicide act 1961 on January 31, 2012 | Leave a Comment »
Archbishop on warpath
Posted in Art. 14 | Anti-Discrimination, Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion, Discrimination, In the news, Public/Private, Religion, tagged church, Gay marriage on January 29, 2012 | 14 Comments »
Dr John Sentamu, the Archbishop of York, has thrown a firecracker into the consultation on gay marriage, which is about to begin in March. In an interview with the Daily Telegraph he declared that he did not agree that it was the role of the state to define what marriage is. ”It is set in tradition and history and [...]
A human right to object to war
Posted in Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion, Case summaries, In the news, Politics / Public Order, Religion on December 13, 2011 | 7 Comments »
R v Michael Peter Lyons [2011] EWCA Crim 2808- read judgment Moral objections to the UK’s involvement in Afghanistan do not constitute a defence to an insubordination charge, the Court Martial Appeal Court has ruled. The appellant was not entitled to disobey a lawful command on the ground of conscientious objection. At the age of [...]
Lawful for Home Secretary to deport Palestinian activist accused of fostering hatred
Posted in Art. 10 | Freedom of Expression, Art. 11 | Freedom of Association, Art. 8 | Right to Privacy/Family, Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion, Case summaries, Immigration/Extradition, Politics / Public Order, tagged Raed Saleh on November 6, 2011 | 1 Comment »
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – Read Judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. He is not the writer of this post. The First-Tier Tribunal (Asylum and Immigration Chamber), has upheld the decision of the Home Secretary to deport Raed [...]
Equality and Human Rights Commission reverses position on religious cases intervention
Posted in Art. 14 | Anti-Discrimination, Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion, European, In the news, Religion on August 22, 2011 | 2 Comments »
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has reversed its plans to intervene in two European Court of Human Rights cases about religious discrimination. Last month the Commission announced that it would intervene in European Court of Human Rights cases on behalf of religious believers who failed to convince the UK courts that they were being [...]
A leap of faith?
Posted in Art. 14 | Anti-Discrimination, Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion, Employment, In the news, Religion, tagged EHRC, sexual orientation on July 20, 2011 | 8 Comments »
In the midst of all the coverage of the phone hacking scandal and the mounting woes of News Corporation an interesting piece of human rights news from the past week got lost: the announcement by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (“EHRC”) that it is applying to intervene in four cases before the European Court of [...]
Hey, teacher! Leave those cornrows alone
Posted in Art. 14 | Anti-Discrimination, Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion, Children, Discrimination, Education, In the news, tagged cornrows on June 20, 2011 | 5 Comments »
Updated | SG v St Gregory’s Catholic Science College [2011] EWHC 1452 (Admin) (17 June 2010) – Read judgment Most people have their first taste of injustice at school. This is hardly surprising: an institution containing hundreds of teenagers for whom rebellion is a biological imperative is always going to be difficult to control. In [...]
Should male circumcision be banned?
Posted in Art. 14 | Anti-Discrimination, Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion, In the news, Medical, Religion on June 15, 2011 | 19 Comments »
Yesterday Neil Howard and Rebecca Steinfeld asked via guardian.co.uk whether it is Time to ban male circumcision? The article was prompted by attempts to ban the practice in San Francisco. Male circumcision is common amongst Muslims and Jews, but judging from the 286 comments (so far!) to the article, there are a lot of people who feel [...]
Religious freedom doesn’t stop at the prison gate
Posted in Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion, Case law, Case summaries, In the news, Prisons, Religion on June 7, 2011 | 4 Comments »
R (Imran Bashir) v. The Independent Adjudicator, HMP Ryehill and the Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1108 – read judgment here. 1 Crown Office Row’s John Joliffe appeared for the Secretary of State for Justice in this case. He is not the writer of this post. The High Court held last week that disciplining a [...]
Control orders and human rights to family life: not always incompatible
Posted in Art. 11 | Freedom of Association, Art. 8 | Right to Privacy/Family, Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion, Case comments, Case law, Margin of Appreciation, Terrorism, tagged anti-terrorist legislation, Control orders on June 1, 2011 | 2 Comments »
CD v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1273 (Admin) Read judgment As readers of this blog will know, control orders have often been successfully challenged in the courts on human rights grounds. But in this case, an order forcing a person to relocate to a different part of the country was found to be [...]
Ban on religious couple adopting?.. On the naughty step
Posted in Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion, Defamation / Libel, Family, In the news, Poor reporting on April 26, 2011 | 6 Comments »
Human rights and discrimination law are often criticised in the press. Sometimes the criticisms are justified, but the level of anger which a system of universal rights can generate is sometimes surprising. Unfortunately, some of that anger is caused by inaccurate reporting of judgments. In yesterday’s Telegraph online, Cristina Odone blogged on a recent “scandal” [...]
Analysis: the place of religion in foster care decisions
Posted in Art. 14 | Anti-Discrimination, Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion, Case comments, Case summaries, Children, Religion on March 2, 2011 | 5 Comments »
Johns v Derby City Council and Equality and Human Rights Commission (intervening) [2011] EWHC 375 (Admin)- Read judgment Religious views opposing homosexuality are a legitimate fostering concern and the local authority’s approach to this question did not constitute religious discrimination. The claimant husband and wife applied to the defendant local authority to be approved as [...]
Welcome!
Browse by legal topic
Recommended- The Fat Tax - Daniel Barnett - Dale & Co. February 9, 2012
- Case Law: Axel Springer v Germany, Grand Chamber finds violation of Article 10 – Sara Mansoori February 9, 2012
- Supreme Court decision on Rabone v Pennine Care NHS Trust - Hempsons February 9, 2012
- T, R (on the application of) v Greater Manchester Police & Anor [2012] EWHC 147 (Admin) (09 February 2012) February 9, 2012Student fails in human rights challenge to Enhanced Criminal Records Certificate with warning incurred when he was 11 for theft of 2 bicycles
- Strasbourg Rulings on Two Personal Privacy Claims February 8, 2012
- Open Justice « 2drj February 8, 2012
- Wigs off, jeans on at the Judicial College | Joshua Rozenberg | Law | guardian.co.uk February 8, 2012
- Contempt laws are still valid in the internet age | Dominic Grieve February 8, 2012
- Case law
- T, R (on the application of) v Greater Manchester Police & Anor [2012] EWHC 147 (Admin) (09 February 2012) February 9, 2012Student fails in human rights challenge to Enhanced Criminal Records Certificate with warning incurred when he was 11 for theft of 2 bicycles
- Othman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSIAC B1 (6 February 2012) February 8, 2012Terrorist suspect Abu Qatada granted bail on strict conditions. However, Secretary of State must show evidence of progress in his deportation in next 3 months then deprivation of liberty will no longer be justifiable.
- AT v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 42 (07 February 2012) February 7, 2012Control order of member of Libyan Islamic Fighting Group ruled unlawful as wasn't given enough information about case against him as mandated in A v UK
- Moussaoui, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 126 (Admin) (03 February 2012) February 6, 2012Detention of Mentally ill foreign criminal pending deportation was unlawful as regular reviews not carried out. Given damages of £1
- Coogan v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 48 February 1, 2012Investigator Glen Mulcaire loses self-incrimination appeal against order that he should reveal phone hacking clients.
- D and S, R (on the application of) v Manchester City Council [2012] EWHC 17 (Admin) (12 January 2012) January 31, 2012Chalenge by 2 elderly disabled people to £17m adult social care cuts by Manchester City Council fails. Consultation and regard to equality duties adequate.
- T, R (on the application of) v Greater Manchester Police & Anor [2012] EWHC 147 (Admin) (09 February 2012) February 9, 2012
-
UKHRB on Twitter
- RT @SkyNewsBreak: David Cameron has spoken to King Abdullah of Jordan to try to extradite radical cleric Abu Qatada 41 minutes ago
- RT @daniel_barnett: Here's what I REALLY think about the Stott case - http://t.co/gCIHyevb. @AdamWagner1 also has excellent piece at htt ... 1 hour ago
- Congrats to @1crownofficerow's Martin Forde QC, to fill Judicial Appointments Commission vacancy left by Lord Sumption http://t.co/wu7yVWAx 2 hours ago
- RT @INFORRM: Case Law: Axel Springer v Germany, Grand Chamber finds violation of Article 10 - Sara Mansoori http://t.co/r5pBIQU3 2 hours ago
- ... would have found that but for case law! Mr Justice Parker inviting Court of Appeal / Supreme Court to bite the bullet here 3 hours ago
- ... also gives permission to appeal. Wld have found scheme "provides no mechanism for review.. disproportionate.. not compatible with A8.".. 3 hours ago
- ... police warning were for theft of 2 bicycles when 11, student now 20. High Court judge "reluctantly" finds no breach of article 8... 3 hours ago
- Recent posts
- Abu Qatada relased on “very restrictive” bail conditions February 9, 2012 Rosalind English
- Please stow your rights in the overhead compartment February 9, 2012 Rosalind English
- Hospital had human rights duty to protect voluntary patient from suicide, rules Supreme Court February 8, 2012 Adam Wagner
- Libya employee can sue for dismissal in UK February 8, 2012 Rosalind English
- Times contempt challenge thrown out in Strasbourg February 8, 2012 Adam Wagner
- Indefinite detention: not very British February 8, 2012 freemovement
- UK Supreme Court is tweeting, but where are the other courts? February 7, 2012 Adam Wagner
- Axel Springer and Von Hannover: Grand Chamber victory for media – Inforrm February 7, 2012 1 Crown Office Row
Disclaimer
Religious freedom does not stop at the prison gates – Part 2
Posted in Art. 9 | Thought/Conscience/Religion, Case comments, Case summaries, In the news, Prisons, Religion on July 21, 2011 | 3 Comments »
Jakobski v Poland (December 2010) – read judgment Mahayana Buddhists have profound moral objections to eating meat. According to the rules, a Mahayana Buddhist should avoid eating meat to cultivate compassion for all living beings. Even peaceable Buddhists commit crimes sometimes and go to prison. Meat free diets however are not available in all European [...]
Read Full Post »