A Local Authority v H [2012] EWHC 49 (COP) – Read judgment The Court of Protection has ruled that an autistic woman with an IQ of 64 does not have the mental capacity to engage in sexual relations, on the basis that she does not understand the implications and cannot effectively deploy the information she has [...]
Archive for the ‘Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment’ Category
Sound of tumbleweed greets secret civil trials proposals
Posted in Art. 10 | Freedom of Expression, Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, Costs and Procedure, In the news, Inquests and Inquiries, Judges and Juries, Secret justice, Terrorism, tagged Justice and Security Green Paper, shoulder shrug on February 14, 2012 | 5 Comments »
65 responses to the Justice and Security Green Paper consultation, which proposes introducing “Closed Material Procedures” – secret trials – into civil courts, have been published on the official consultation website. According to the site there are potentially 25 more to come. Whilst it is a good thing that the responses have been published at [...]
Indefinite detention: not very British
Posted in Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, Criminal, European, Immigration/Extradition, In the news, Prisons, Terrorism, tagged abu qatada on February 8, 2012 | 10 Comments »
Angus McCullough QC appeared for Abu Qatada as his Special Advocate in the domestic proceedings before SIAC, the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords. He is not the author of this post. ‘Human Rights Act to blame!’ is a frequent refrain in the media, as well reported on this blog. Often, though, the outcome [...]
Extradition of murder accused to US not breach of human rights
Posted in Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, Case law, Criminal, Immigration/Extradition, International, Prisons, tagged Harkins and Edwards on January 19, 2012 | 1 Comment »
HARKINS AND EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM – 9146/07 [2012] ECHR 45 – Read judgment The European Court of Human Rights has found that there would be no breach of Article 3 ECHR (prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment) in extraditing two men accused of murder to the US. The men argued that they face the death [...]
Gibson rendition and torture inquiry has been scrapped
Posted in Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, In the news, Inquests and Inquiries, Politics / Public Order, Technology, tagged Ken Clarke, police investigations on January 18, 2012 | 2 Comments »
1 Crown Office Row’s Philippa Whipple QC was leading counsel to the Gibson Inquiry. She is not the writer of this post The Justice Secretary has told Parliament that the Gibson Inquiry tasked with considering whether Britain was “implicated in the improper treatment of detainees, held by other countries, that may have occurred in the [...]
Strasbourg: L’enfant terrible
Posted in Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, European, In the news, Media, tagged abu qatada, European Court of Human Rights on January 18, 2012 | 1 Comment »
A bit like news of a wayward celebrity, judgments from the European Court of Human Rights are now awaited with a mixture of trepidation and excitement. Whatever are those crazy unelected judges going to do next? Will this be the latest “Judgment day” for the enfant terrible of Strasbourg? Yesterday the court released three judgments [...]
Youth restraint challenge rejected by High Court
Posted in Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, Art. 8 | Right to Privacy/Family, Case comments, Case summaries, Children, In the news, Poor reporting, Prisons, tagged Access to justice, Standing on January 16, 2012 | 1 Comment »
The Children’s Rights Alliance for England (CRAE) v Secretary of State for Justice and G4S Care and Justice Services (UK) Ltd and Serco plc [2012] EWHC 8 (Admin) – read judgment Although certain restraining measures had been taken unlawfully against young people in secure training centres for a number of years, the court had no jurisdiction [...]
The ECJ on Aslyum, Greece; the UK Protocol on the EU Charter – Dr Cian Murphy
Posted in Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, Case comments, European, Immigration/Extradition, tagged asylum law, asylum seekers, EU Charter, refugee applications on December 28, 2011 |
Last Wednesday, the European Court of Justice issued a flurry of judgments just before the Christmas break. Indeed, there were so many interesting and important decisions amongst the twenty or so handed down that seems foolish to consider any of them the ‘most important’. Nonetheless the judgment in NS and Others v SSHD (C-411/10) must be a contender [...]
Investigation team “lacks necessary independence” for MOD ill-treatment allegations
Posted in Art. 2 | Right to life, Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, Case summaries, Inquests and Inquiries, Politics / Public Order, Technology on November 23, 2011 | 1 Comment »
Ali Zaki Mousa v Secretary of State for Defence & Anr [2011] EWCA Civ 133 - read judgment Philip Havers QC of 1 Crown Office Row represented the respondent secretary of state in this case. He is not the author of this post. The Court of Appeal has ruled that the Iraq Historic Allegations [...]
Julian Assange loses High Court appeal against extradition
Posted in Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, Case summaries, Immigration/Extradition, tagged Julian Assange on November 2, 2011 | 7 Comments »
Julian Assange -v- Swedish Prosecution Authority – Read judgment / summary Julian Assange, founder of the whistle-blowing website Wikileaks, has lost his High Court appeal against extradition to Sweden. He lost on all four grounds of appeal. Unless he is granted permission to appeal to the Supreme Court under Section 32 of the Extradition Act [...]
Challenge to intelligence services guidance succeeds in part – Shaheen Rahman
Posted in Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, Case summaries, Criminal, International, Terrorism, tagged Equality and Human Rights Commission v Prime Minister & Ors [2011] EWHC 2401 (Admin) -, hooding on October 6, 2011 |
Equality and Human Rights Commission v Prime Minister & Ors [2011] EWHC 2401 (Admin) – Read judgment A challenge to published guidance for intelligence officers interviewing detainees overseas has been partially successful. Mr Al Bazzouni and the EHRC argued that the guidance as to what officers should do if they suspect detainees might be subject [...]
Anti-terrorism powers for a rainy day
Posted in Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, Art. 5 | Right to Liberty, Art. 8 | Right to Privacy/Family, Criminal, In the news, Terrorism, tagged Control orders, TPIM on September 4, 2011 | 2 Comments »
Updated | Next week will mark the 10th anniversary of the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks. Despite the intervening decade, the states threatened by terrorism are still puzzling out the right balance between the powers of security services and the rights of suspected terrorists to due process. Although terrorism is now mercifully low on the public [...]
Al-Skeini may open door to more war claims
Posted in Art. 2 | Right to life, Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, Art. 5 | Right to Liberty, Article 1 | ECHR jurisdiction, Case comments, European, International, tagged Al Skeini on August 15, 2011 | 2 Comments »
The recent European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) judgment in Al-Skeini will certainly enter the Court’s hall of fame as a landmark judgment for pushing the boundaries of the European Convention on Human Rights’s jurisdiction. While it may take us some time to appreciate the full implications of this judgment, one of its possible consequences is the [...]
Will the Detainee Inquiry be human rights compliant?
Posted in Art. 2 | Right to life, Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, In the news, Inquests and Inquiries, tagged Detainee inquiry on August 8, 2011 |
Ten human rights campaign groups and the lawyers for a number of detainees alleging UK involvement in their mistreatment have confirmed that they will be boycotting the impending Detainee Inquiry. We recently posted on the publication of the Terms of Reference and the Protocol for the Detainee Inquiry and set out some of the reaction [...]
Welcome!
Browse by legal topic
Recommended- Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2012] UKSC 22 (30 May 2012) May 30, 2012Supreme Court rules by 5-2 majority that Julian Assange must be extradited to Sweden. Definition of "judicial authority" is a wide one.
- Supreme Court judgment: Assange v Swedish Judicial Authority - Carl Gardner May 30, 2012
- Julian Assange's extradition stayed thanks to quick legal footwork | Joshua Rozenberg | Law | guardian.co.uk May 30, 2012
- New Judgment: Assange v The Swedish Judicial Authority [2012] UKSC 22 May 30, 2012
- What if Julian Assange loses in the Supreme Court? May 29, 2012
- Secret justice concessions won't silence its critics | The Spectator May 29, 2012
- ICLR's case summaries are now on Guardian Law | Daniel Hoadley | Law | guardian.co.uk May 29, 2012
- The High Court is unable to agree on Twitter Joke Trial appeal - David Allen Green May 28, 2012
- Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2012] UKSC 22 (30 May 2012) May 30, 2012
- Case law
- Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2012] UKSC 22 (30 May 2012) May 30, 2012Supreme Court rules by 5-2 majority that Julian Assange must be extradited to Sweden. Definition of "judicial authority" is a wide one.
- SCOPPOLA v. ITALY (No. 3) - 126/05 [2012] ECHR 868 (22 May 2012) May 23, 2012ECtHR Grand Chamber: automatic and indiscriminate disenfranchisement of prisoners unlawful but up to individual states how to implement changes were such a ban exist
- Dishonesty in entry clearance applications May 21, 2012An Upper Tribunal (UT) decision confirms that, where an application for entry clearance is “marred by dishonesty” – whether in the applicant’s knowledge or not and even where the applicant is presently eligible for entry – it is not a disproportionate response for the Home Secretary to refuse the application, even in light of Article 8
- MM and AO (A Child), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 668 (18 May 2012) May 18, 2012Secretary of State acted lawfully in not ordering independent inquiry into 2009 protest at Immigration Detention Centre. Challenge by children separated from parents during protest and claiming pschiatric damage as result.
- British Sky Broadcasting Ltd & Ors, R (on the application of) v Chelmsford Crown Court [2012] EWHC 1295 (Admin) (17 May 2012) May 17, 2012Sky, BBC, ITN etc. succeed in JR of decision by court to order production of 100+ hours of video footage to Essex Police of Dale Farm protesters: "... there were no reasonable grounds for believing that the footage of over 100 hours included material likely to be of substantial value to the investigation"
- Humphreys v Revenue and Customs [2012] UKSC 18 (16 May 2012) May 16, 2012Supreme Court: paying child tax credit to "main" care giver not discriminatory under art.14 ECHR to father caring for child 3 days per week. The specific test for justifying discrimination in the context of state benefits is that with questions of social and economic strategy the Court will generally respect the legislature’s policy choice unless i […]
- Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2012] UKSC 22 (30 May 2012) May 30, 2012
-
UKHRB on Twitter
- #Assange loses SC appeal 5 votes to 2. Like to be #ECtHR application to block #extradition 4 hours ago
- #Assange Supreme Court decision imminent bbc.co.uk/news/uk-182594… #extradition 5 hours ago
- Also fresh on the blog- The Erika: Cour de Cassation has its thinking cap on by David Hart QC ukhumanrightsblog.com/2012/05/29/the… 5 hours ago
- Good morning all, @IsabelMcArdle here. Justive and Security Bill- the govt is not for turning by Angela Patrick ukhumanrightsblog.com/2012/05/29/jus… 5 hours ago
Adam Wagner on Twitter
- RT @simonmckay: Catt v Metropolitan Police. Important case on #protest and #dataretention. Would be surprised if it was not appealed:htt ... 53 minutes ago
- For anyone who hasn't read it > Justice & Security Bill: Government is not for turning - Angela Patrick of @justicehq: wp.me/pJiO3-3Gc 1 hour ago
- RT @CrowtherSimon: Excellent piece by @justicehq's Angela Patrick on Just& Sec Bill on @ukhumanrightsb ukhumanrightsblog.com/2012/05/29/jus… #secretj ... 1 hour ago
- RT @I_am_peevee: @AdamWagner1 @gideonconn "and excellent artist"... 1 hour ago
- My friend and brilliant musician @GideonConn has a brand new video: youtube.com/watch?v=tX-ZrZ… 1 hour ago
- Excellent from @joshuarozenerg on the potentially embarrassing mess surrounding the #Assange ruling is.gd/4Qs0h3 1 hour ago
- Recent posts
- The Erika: Cour de Cassation has its thinking cap on May 29, 2012 David Hart QC
- Justice and Security Bill: The Government is not for turning – Angela Patrick May 29, 2012 1 Crown Office Row
- We need to think about Kevin May 29, 2012 Rosalind English
- Key Justice and Security Bill resources May 29, 2012 Adam Wagner
- Free Speech at Work: A 1COR Seminar and Mock Trial – Wed 27th June May 29, 2012 1 Crown Office Row
- Time and time again: Article 6 to the rescue May 27, 2012 David Hart QC
- Prisoner voting, Bratza’s replacement and peaceful protest – The Human Rights Roundup May 27, 2012 Wessen Jazrawi
- The case for letting prisoners vote – Reuven Ziegler May 24, 2012 1 Crown Office Row
Disclaimer
No deportation for Abu Qatada, but where are we now on torture evidence? – Professor Adam Tomkins
Posted in Art. 3 | Torture / Inhumane Treatment, Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, Case comments, Children, European, Terrorism, tagged abu qatada, European Court of Human Rights, immigration appeals on January 19, 2012 | 1 Comment »
OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) v. THE UNITED KINGDOM – 8139/09 [2012] ECHR 56 – Read judgment - updated (7/2/2012): Abu Qatada is expected to be released from Long Lartin maximum security jail within days. the special immigration appeals commission (Siac) ruled on Monday that Qatada should be freed, despite the Home Office saying he continued to pose a [...]
Read Full Post »